Other - Politics & Government - June 2006

okay. think about it on our money it says in god we trust.
in the pledge we say one nation under god.
i dont get it.
i know some people do not believe in him and i understand but why deny that our founding fathers did?

2006-06-13 16:30:17 · 8 answers · asked by killer kid* 1

2006-06-13 16:29:07 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-13 16:22:35 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-13 16:09:10 · 13 answers · asked by da1014 1

we should have never gone to Iraq?

Who appointed the U.S. as the world's police, anyway?

2006-06-13 16:00:26 · 23 answers · asked by Professor Chaos386 4

2006-06-13 15:43:44 · 12 answers · asked by Rich 2

2006-06-13 15:34:26 · 8 answers · asked by KatzPlace 6

2006-06-13 15:33:06 · 9 answers · asked by CarloS 2

2006-06-13 15:32:09 · 4 answers · asked by KatzPlace 6

I wanna sue the chinese because I got a bad plate of kung pao chicken.

2006-06-13 15:21:27 · 6 answers · asked by Coffee-Infused Insomniac 3

What I am asking in short above is if the subset of Fundementalis Christians who judge, look down on, ostracize, and otherwise proclaim the unacceptable nature of others's law abiding behavior, sometimes calling that behavior an "abomination against God," are they themselves violating one of God's laws as spoken by Jesus of Nazareth when he prevented the imminent stoning of a "Sinner Woman" by speaking the words "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone?" I know fundementalists read the bible as the word of God exactly as God directed the hands of the men who wrote it to write it. They don't interpret it, but doesn't it seem that the quote in question means that "all of you mortal humans are sinners, whether your sins become public or are kept secret, you are all sinners and therefore you should not judge each other's sins?"
This is political as these very people invoke their absolute and certain "knowledge of God's will" to lobby for new laws & the overturn of others!

2006-06-13 15:05:43 · 14 answers · asked by kp67 1

2006-06-13 14:43:07 · 8 answers · asked by Kate M 1

What are the major differences between muslim culture and american culture?

2006-06-13 14:23:47 · 6 answers · asked by Abel D 1

Somebody, anybody, PLEASE give proof that the war in Iraq is for oil, if you can.

2006-06-13 14:20:57 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-13 14:17:42 · 14 answers · asked by ARule 2

2006-06-13 14:02:43 · 6 answers · asked by brandil55 2

Is it because they will do the same thing if they are elected?

2006-06-13 13:35:58 · 20 answers · asked by Larry B 1

2006-06-13 13:28:53 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

47% of Turks are against EU, but the government is not pulling back the EU application. Do you really think Turkey will recognise Greek Cyprus unless
- Cyprus unites under a federation (Greeks vetoed this before) or
- North Cyprus Turkish Republic is recognised or
- Turkey joins EU

Or is Turkey using her EU application to put pressure on Greek Cypriots?

2006-06-13 13:28:17 · 3 answers · asked by Alp 3

2006-06-13 13:09:49 · 9 answers · asked by Abysschick 3

2006-06-13 13:08:01 · 18 answers · asked by Mellencamp JC 2

Something other than stay there til the job is done..

2006-06-13 12:59:23 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Recently there has been some talks in Puerto Rico to see if the status of the island changes. It has to change to either statehood or indipendence. I for one am Puerorican and proud of it but I am also an american citizen and I am serving in the ARMY and proud of it too. I would like my little island to finally become part of the US instead of just a territory of the US. The problem is that there are three political parties, one tha is pro statehood, one that is pro indipendence and one that just wants to stay the same way they are now and for the past few years they have being frightening the people of Puerto Rico telling them how bad it would be if Puerto Rico becomes either a state or a republic. I think the US should give Puerto Rico the option to choose only between statehood and/or indipendence to get the issue resolved once and for all.

2006-06-13 12:51:33 · 15 answers · asked by MEL831 2

2006-06-13 12:50:17 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

It's absolutely hilarious how you brits throw away your money on a bunch of overpaid, inbred gay monarchs who use it for their own personal leisure and comfort. They are a figurehead, that is true, but you waste millions of dollars on them every year and they do NOTHING for it except represent you, and badly, I might add. Why don't you vote for a government WITHOUT royals??
Laugh about Bush all you want (even though you SHOULD be laughing about Blair, like us), but he is at least representing a country that is the most powerful in the world.
The United States of America was founded by a few soldiers who didn't know what to do, against the best army in the world, and they won, thousands of miles away from their mother country. YOU, hundreds of years later, are still letting those gay royals bathe themselves in your tax money. Time for a change, eh? Go to www.throneout.com, they know what they're talking about.

2006-06-13 12:48:10 · 21 answers · asked by Penelope L 2

2006-06-13 12:38:30 · 4 answers · asked by wjscottjones 1

2006-06-13 12:30:14 · 10 answers · asked by ? 1

We say we want to spread democracy and freedom yet we ignore the desperate pleas of people being slaughtered in genocide. What the hell is wrong with us here in USA that we intervene in IRAQ at cost of BILLLIONs but will not spend a cent to help some people that REALLY need it. The IRAQIS do not even want out help. the Ruwandans are begging us to help.

2006-06-13 12:22:42 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-13 12:21:39 · 7 answers · asked by wjscottjones 1

Is Osama the #1 most wanted terrorist again? Or are we still not speaking of him?

2006-06-13 12:14:33 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous