English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Other - Politics & Government - June 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

2006-06-27 05:05:26 · 2 answers · asked by Norma R 1

Seems they are always called right wing, but somehow I feel that isn't right.

They supported welfare programs for the Germans.
They banned companies from firing people.
They subsidized holidays for Germans (Kraft durch Freude).
They spead lies about the Jews, just as the modern left does about Israel.
They were very much in favor of natural laws, banned vivisection on pain of death.
Euthanasia is also something modern lefties like (culture of death).

Sounds pretty left wing/socialist to me. Come to think of it, they actually were socialists.

2006-06-27 05:04:29 · 13 answers · asked by marceldev29 4

2006-06-27 05:00:04 · 29 answers · asked by Qu3L 2

If right wing Repuglicans are so against sex outside of marriage, what was El Rushbo, the terrorist of the airways doing with Viagra. Hmmmmmm

2006-06-27 04:59:34 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

The "terrorists" that were caught in Florida suspected of plotting to blow up buildings in Chicago were black americans (2 were Haitian) and were from the hood. They had no money, no weapons, no chemicals and no direction - basically a lot of hot air. Even the media said their plotting was more aspirational than operational. Should they be charged as terrorists?

2006-06-27 04:53:42 · 6 answers · asked by bb m 1

Lets say one day eveyone got sick of living with each other. So now we became two countries. All the Republicans moved to one side of the country and all the Democats moved to the other side. Then one day we went to war. Which side do you think would win? And why would that side win?

Heres my prediction:
When the two countries formed liberals would have banned guns so none of there civilains would have had firearms to protect themselves. Conservaties would have made it easier to purcahse firearms to more of the populations would be armed. Liberals would push for negoitations and not for war. Conservaties would arm themseleves right away for war. Each side would brand the other side as "terrorists". The conservative side would have a strong military and the liberals would have a very litte if any military. Liberals would keep pushing for more negotiations and Conservaties would come in to the liberal country in the middle of the night and take over faster than we took over Afganistan.

2006-06-27 04:46:16 · 7 answers · asked by flyguy03 3

I hate cigarettes, but I know they will always be legal because they make so much frickin money off of the stinky things.

2006-06-27 04:32:21 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think that Bush is just like the men who he is fighting against and that's why this war is takng so long to end. Why is it okay for his administration to aprove phone tapping and now people spying on your funds? What happened to privacy? please help me understand this war.

2006-06-27 04:25:20 · 11 answers · asked by frenchyxoxo 1

He was detained at the airport because he had a prescription in his possession that was not in his name. It was a bottle of viagra.
Is this guy married? Does he have a girlfriend? What is his sexual preference.

2006-06-27 04:20:46 · 5 answers · asked by Lou 6

interesting concept, i think.

2006-06-27 03:48:36 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

whose lives were effected by the Jim Crow Laws in the South?

Before the civil rights movement, the "separate but equal" farce provided inferior schooling and housing. Not to mention separate water fountains, restrooms, and being forced to the back of the bus.

The KKK was allowed to run rampant, burning churches and lynching people with little to no fear of prosecution.

Should the people who were treated this way be compensated? Why or why not?

2006-06-27 03:11:03 · 37 answers · asked by Professor Chaos386 4

Ted Kennedy
George W. Bush
Bill Clinton
Nancy Pelosi
John Conyers
Jeb Bush
Mark Warner
Barak Obama

2006-06-27 02:49:23 · 16 answers · asked by John D 2

2006-06-27 02:37:23 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-27 01:48:19 · 4 answers · asked by meganjalisa 1

2006-06-27 00:58:10 · 1 answers · asked by Ahmad B 1

I got my documents fine, but I may not have done and I am still waiting delivery for my passport.

2006-06-27 00:50:47 · 7 answers · asked by Mummy of 2 7

i hear bread is $140 000 what more??

2006-06-27 00:33:22 · 2 answers · asked by sweets 2

2006-06-27 00:32:27 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-27 00:31:33 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I dare say not!

1. 80% of all votes in America are counted by only two companies: Diebold and ES&S.

http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/042804landes.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diebold
2. There is no federal agency with regulatory authority or oversight of the U.S. voting machine industry.

http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0916-04.htm
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/042804landes.html

3. The vice-president of Diebold and the president of ES&S are brothers.

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/private_company.html
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/042804landes.html

4. The chairman and CEO of Diebold is a major Bush campaign organizer and donor who wrote in 2003 that he was "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/28/sunday/main632436.shtml
http://www.wishtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=1647886

5. Republican Senator Chuck Hagel used to be chairman of ES&S. He became Senator based on votes counted by ES&S machines.

http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/columns/2004/03/03_200.html
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/031004Fitrakis/031004fitrakis.html

6. Republican Senator Chuck Hagel, long-connected with the Bush family, was recently caught lying about his ownership of ES&S by the Senate Ethics Committee.

http://www.blackboxvoting.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=26
http://www.hillnews.com/news/012903/hagel.aspx
http://www.onlisareinsradar.com/archives/000896.php

7. Senator Chuck Hagel was on a short list of George W. Bush's vice-presidential candidates.

http://www.businessweek.com/2000/00_28/b3689130.htm
http://theindependent.com/stories/052700/new_hagel27.html

8. ES&S is the largest voting machine manufacturer in the U.S. and counts almost 60% of all U.S. votes.

http://www.essvote.com/HTML/about/about.html
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/042804landes.html


9. Diebold's new touch screen voting machines have no paper trail of any votes. In other words, there is no way to verify that the data coming out of the machine is the same as what was legitimately put in by voters.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0225-05.htm
http://www.itworld.com/Tech/2987/041020evotestates/pfindex.html


10. Diebold also makes ATMs, checkout scanners, and ticket machines, all of which log each transaction and can generate a paper trail.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0225-05.htm
http://www.diebold.com/solutions/default.htm

11. Diebold is based in Ohio.

http://www.diebold.com/aboutus/ataglance/default.htm

12. Diebold employed 5 convicted felons as consultants and developers to help write the central compiler computer code that counted 50% of the votes in 30 states.

http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,61640,00.html
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/10/301469.shtml

13. Jeff Dean was Senior Vice-President of Global Election Systems when it was bought by Diebold. Even though he had been convicted of 23 counts of felony theft in the first degree, Jeff Dean was retained as a consultant by Diebold and was largely responsible for programming the optical scanning software now used in most of the United States.

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0312/S00191.htm
http://www.chuckherrin.com/HackthevoteFAQ.htm#how
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-8.pdf

14. Diebold consultant Jeff Dean was convicted of planting back doors in his software and using a "high degree of sophistication" to evade detection over a period of 2 years.

http://www.chuckherrin.com/HackthevoteFAQ.htm#how
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-8.pdf

15. None of the international election observers were allowed in the polls in Ohio.

http://www.globalexchange.org/update/press/2638.html
http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2004/10/26/loc_elexoh.html

16. California banned the use of Diebold machines because the security was so bad. Despite Diebold's claims that the audit logs could not be hacked, a chimpanzee was able to do it! (See the movie here: http://blackboxvoting.org/baxter/baxterVPR.mov.)

http://wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,63298,00.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4874190

17. 30% of all U.S. votes are carried out on unverifiable touch screen voting machines with no paper trail.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/28/sunday/main632436.shtml

18. All -- not some -- but all the voting machine errors detected and reported in Florida went in favor of Bush or Republican candidates.

http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,65757,00.html
http://www.yuricareport.com/ElectionAftermath04/ThreeResearchStudiesBushIsOut.htm
http://www.rise4news.net/extravotes.html
http://www.ilcaonline.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=950
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0411/S00227.htm

19. The governor of the state of Florida, Jeb Bush, is the President's brother.

http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/tallahassee/news/local/7628725.htm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10544-2004Oct29.html

20. Serious voting anomalies in Florida -- again always favoring Bush -- have been mathematically demonstrated and experts are recommending further investigation.

http://www.yuricareport.com/ElectionAftermath04/ThreeResearchStudiesBushIsOut.htm
http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/policy/story/0,10801,97614,00.html
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/tens_of_thousands.html
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1106-30.htm
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2004/110904.html
http://uscountvotes.org/

2006-06-27 00:23:49 · 5 answers · asked by the_decider 2

they are animals who cannot be treated for their sick actions & fantasy's, we should hang them all..

2006-06-26 23:34:17 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Comparing capabilities to do it and resources to avoid it. Could OBL do it.

2006-06-26 23:03:47 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-26 22:47:48 · 19 answers · asked by Brackalicious 4

Bush ignores laws he inks, vexing Congress By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer
29 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - A bill becomes the rule of the land when Congress passes it and the president signs it into law, right?


Not necessarily, according to the White House. A law is not binding when a president issues a separate statement saying he reserves the right to revise, interpret or disregard it on national security and constitutional grounds.

That's the argument a Bush administration official is expected to make Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Arlen Specter, R-Pa., who has demanded a hearing on a practice he considers an example of the administration's abuse of power.

"It's a challenge to the plain language of the Constitution," Specter said in an interview with The Associated Press. "I'm interested to hear from the administration just what research they've done to lead them to the conclusion that they can cherry-pick."

2006-06-26 22:45:09 · 15 answers · asked by cantcu 7

I am. So there's 1 vote down.

2006-06-26 21:53:39 · 11 answers · asked by ? 1

anyone else a little worried that the religious are in control of our nation's government? these people that are supposed to make important possibly life altering and future shaping decisions that are supposedly based on facts and research and reflect our citizen's hopes and concerns, tend to make their decisions based on the basis of their religious backgrounds. i don't know about you, but i don't want some guy who believes that jesus is going to "take us home" next year to be calling the shots in washington or have any sort of power at all. they world may very well end soon, but i don't want that to effect mine or anyone else's lives today.

2006-06-26 21:24:56 · 15 answers · asked by Reza 3

fedest.com, questions and answers