Should we just believe that 9/11 was really an OBL act. Did he possess this capability in backrop of US hitech

Question

Comparing capabilities to do it and resources to avoid it. Could OBL do it.

Answer 1

The "OBL and the 7 dwarfs" theory is probably the least plausible conspiracy case for the 9/11 attacks. Unfortunately, it is the only one that has been investigated in "back-assward fashion".

Normally, in a real investigation, you look at motive, opportunity, and resources. You investigate and gather the facts on those things, and then you build a case that fits the facts. You don't start with an instant conclusion and then work backwards to change or cherry-pick facts to fit your conclusion. In science they call this "pathological science", where a mad scientist comes up with a wierd theory and then proves it with narrow examples...and facts contradicting this theory are summarily tossed out, changed outright, or ridiculed. In law, this kind of theorizing leads to "kangaroo courts", where the "burden of proof" is on the defendent and not the prosecution.

The real video evidence, science, 1st-hand witness statements, and paper-trails all contradict the official conspiracy theory. Will we ever get a confession of those that pulled the strings? Of course not, but it is enough for Americans to wake up, see the truth, and those that did perpetrate the attacks won't be able to pull off another one.

Answer 2

Bush is a liar when saying he did not know of any perceivable attacks in the near future before 9/11. I know he's lying about this because I was on vacation in another country in August of 2001 and a news report came up about how the White House was not going to take a threat that they received from a terrorist group very seriously. His cabinet was bound to tell Bush something. However, he was not the one that carried on with the attacks. It was the brilliant Osama Bin Laden that snapped his fingers. That a**h**e!!! No matter what though...United States of America...simply the best!!!

Answer 3

Do you have enough reason to believe otherwise?

If you don't think OBL could have done it, what consipracy theory are you leaning on?

It would be naive to assume that even a country as hi-tech as the U.S. is not vulnerable. It's a game of cat and mouse, and most of the time, the cat wins. Problem is that when the mouse slips into victory lane, that's all you see or hear about.

Answer 4

How 'hitech' does hijacking a plane need to be? And the hijackers who had pilot training didn't worry about landing or takeoff, just flight, which, if you don't care very much about safety or navigation is not excessively difficult in clear weather.

All you needed was enough people to control the situation and one to fly.

To think they weren't capable of this is to be seriously misinformed. This was low tech actions.

Can we finally stop this conspiracy silliness?

Answer 5

Fun Fact,

OBL has not been formally charge in relation to the Sept. 11 attacks.

Answer 6

yes he did it. move on to the next idiocy