Government - July 2007

Please don't answer with "who cares..bring them home" Your mission is to give me a plan of steps, in order to succeed. Consider the reality, we're building military installations there and a 40 acre embassy. Consider we are planning on staying.

2007-07-07 06:37:41 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

The federal government is considering a series of new rules that would apply to workplaces where "explosives" are handled, giving rise to a concern that the restrictions could be used to limit – or eliminate – reasonable access to firearms ammunition.

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56556

The government is using paperwork errors as small as the abbreviation of a city name to shut down some of the nation's longest-serving gun shops, and 2nd Amendment advocates fear the right to bear arms will mean little if there's no way to obtain a gun.

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56389

The House of Representatives has fast-tracked new legislation to "improve" the National Instant Criminal Background Check System by allowing doctors to now decide who can own firearms.

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56311

2007-07-07 06:37:18 · 7 answers · asked by Cookies Anyone? 5

This dumb 'question' was an answer to one of my questions. How do you think one of the Rebels of 1776 would answer? Maybe since we're all "civilians" we should have to to make gun powder from horse manure, sulfer, and charcoal. Can a "snoopy" fishing pole catch a big fish?

2007-07-07 05:44:58 · 9 answers · asked by smellslikeBS2me 1

The Iraqi people are terrorist, mad cow disease in Canada causing high beef prices, health care gone f--king nuts and now I can not even trust that my toothpaste isn’t going to kill me. Don’t you just love what our government has done to us. My country tis of thee sweet land of ( what a f--king joke). It is sweet for the rich and the illegal. Blacks wanting more and more apologies, well I’m sorry I don’t owe you crap you didn’t pick any cotton you have reaped from the well-fare system. And all the white trash also with the racist bullshit. I mean this country is going down fast. Of course not for the Walton’s
(wal-mart) owners. It is great to have the Chinese supplying them as well as other poor countries with slave like labor so they can all live in mansions and I can guarantee those bastards don’t shop at wal-mart. I wished we could take our country back from the evils that have become. 4rth of July flags made in f--king China I refuse to buy such crap. And oh yeah God Bless America....

2007-07-07 05:05:33 · 3 answers · asked by katiebob1995 2

2007-07-07 03:14:39 · 11 answers · asked by vakharwalaruchir 1

Was it from 1917 (beginning of Communist party rule) to 1956 (when some other Russian leader ordered the de-Stalinizations)? Please help!

2007-07-07 02:45:29 · 4 answers · asked by Yetislayer 1

who could face 90 days in jail plus a $1000. fine?! Because a neighbor is complaining about the "mooing" of her pet cow, Wally. I think this is just totally ridiculous!

2007-07-07 01:25:33 · 9 answers · asked by what u talkin' bout? 7

2007-07-07 01:20:36 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-07 00:47:43 · 8 answers · asked by bapiraju k 2

Why are we not hearing about that in the news. New Orleans was blamed on Bush, and you have the Senator Jefferson, a Democrat from that district, running away with the cash to his freezer? Why are we not in an uproar about that?

2007-07-07 00:01:44 · 6 answers · asked by polity 2

our "government" or bin ladden?

2007-07-06 23:57:56 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Every time I see someone question a Bush/GOP policy or action as being suspicious, the GOP Conservatives rush in shouting Clinton did this and Clinton did that. What about Clinton? Clinton's a liar? blah blah blah... they extend this to Al Gore, Kerry, FDR, Truman, Ted Kennedy...you name it.
But they never ever mention Bush's name..

I am wondering, in the strange world of GOP justice does what Clinton did somehow exonerate Bush from being responsible for what he does?

Is Bush somehow not responsible for the CIA leak because Clinton got a blojob?

Who is President, Clinton or Bush?

The GOP blame Clinton for everything that America has done and become in the last 7 years and that Bush has done nothing of any consequence at all.

2007-07-06 23:45:04 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm British, and mine don't.

2007-07-06 23:44:04 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

I want to contact as many government officials that I can. Is there a way to write one email and send it to all of the officials at one time?

2007-07-06 21:41:46 · 4 answers · asked by grannywinkie 6

It's a representative republic. If you don't believe me look it up.

2007-07-06 19:27:48 · 16 answers · asked by xiiicisco 1

I mean I been thinking of Bush sending more soldiers but they will return some where in 2008 or 2009. Now, Bush sends more soldiers and alot of them die and the more soldiers we lose the less were defensive of terrorists attacks. I dont really heard alot about the war now but do i have point.

2007-07-06 19:21:20 · 5 answers · asked by CFC4Life 5

where the people fear the government you have tranny; where the government fears the people, you have liberty.

2007-07-06 19:02:23 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Prescott Bush--nazi collaborator.
George Bush Senior...Noriega, Allende, Saddam/WMDs. Iran-Contra etc.
Neil Bush- Silverado Savings & Loan
Jeb Bush--Election 2000 in Florida
President Junior......spying CIA leaks no-bid contracts torture etc.

Sounds like a crime family to me.

2007-07-06 18:55:04 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Much of US favors Bush impeachment: poll
Fri Jul 6, 3:59 PM



WASHINGTON (AFP) - Nearly half of the US public wants President George W. Bush to face impeachment, and even more favor that fate for Vice President **** Cheney, according to a poll out Friday.

The survey by the American Research Group found that 45 percent support the US House of Representatives beginning impeachment proceedings against Bush, with 46 percent opposed, and a 54-40 split in favor when it comes to Cheney.


The study by the private New Hampshire-based ARG canvassed 1,100 Americans by telephone July 3-5 and had an error margin of plus or minus three percentage points. The findings are available on ARG's Internet site.


The White House declined to comment on the poll, the latest bad news for a president who has seen his public opinion standings dragged to record lows by the unpopular war in Iraq.

For the entire article

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/afp/070706/usa/us_politics_bush

2007-07-06 18:40:45 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Does the system work anymore?

Is true justice handed out or does corruption still runs wild?

I left India and moved to the US with my family when I was 11, now I'm 19

how's the system over there now?

2007-07-06 18:11:06 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-06 17:57:22 · 3 answers · asked by Irosh Bandara 5

2007-07-06 17:23:51 · 10 answers · asked by sbacharya_61@yahoo.com 2

A survey by the American Research Group found that 45 percent support the US House of Representatives beginning impeachment proceedings against Bush

This question is for you cons who always use the "but Clinton..." defense in response to any critisism of Bush. What's the "but Clinton..." arguement for this one?

2007-07-06 16:53:45 · 11 answers · asked by Retodd 3

What the deal with him and why is so many people pissed of at him besides the Iraq problem?

2007-07-06 16:51:44 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-06 16:10:13 · 35 answers · asked by metaxas 2

2007-07-06 14:35:07 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-06 14:23:47 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

If Dick Cheney is impeached by the House who will preside at his trial? The Constitution only says that the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court presides at a presidential impeachment trial.

2007-07-06 13:38:56 · 16 answers · asked by davidsz9 2

2007-07-06 12:39:29 · 21 answers · asked by FUC.KING RACIST MAGGOTS 1

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070628/ts_alt_afp/usjusticejuries

The death penalty assumes an infallibility of judgement within any system that has it and I want to know if we are compfortable with a certain percentage of people wrongly convicted facing some of the horrors of our penal system. Compared to developing nations we have good prisons etc. but by a higher standard of effectiveness, humanity and deterence to which the rest of the devoloped world holds itself we may rightly be seen as barbaric and authoritarian.
There may be some flaws in the methodology with the approach detailed in the article submitted but the question it raises should be more thoroughly researched. Given the lower violent crime rate in EU and other developed countries we need to re-examine the whole "tough on crime" approach that seems to have bloated our prisons, created whole sub-classes of gangs and institutionalized recidivists on a whole sale basis while raising taxes with lower returns in human terms

2007-07-06 12:02:44 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous