Government - July 2007

After the creation of Pakistan, ther were 34% Hindus in Karanchi, Pakistan. Today there are less than 1$ Hindus in Karanchi. In India there were 8% Muslims in 1947. Today just the official figure of Muslims is around 14%. This figure does not include millions of Illegal Bengalis and Pakistanis .
Muslim agenda in all countries is to breed and work towards a majority. The only solution I see for all democracies is to declare your countries as Christain, HIndu ( including other faiths that are called infidels by Muslims) were Muslims cannot vote. There is nothing wrong in this as many Muslim countries do not give basic rights to non Muslims.
This action needs to be taken now. The west has already woken up to the Muslim agenda 50 years too late. Delay in this matter is dangerous.

2007-07-22 08:48:12 · 2 answers · asked by lunistan 2

I fear it is! Please read this article before replying.

http://www.chris-floyd.com/Articles/Articles/The_Legal_Pervert%27s_Parade%3A_Executive_Privilege_%DCber_Alles/

And this one too if possible. =)
http://www.chris-floyd.com/Articles/Articles/Bringing_It_All_Back_Home%3A_New_Bush_Order_Could_Criminalize_Dissent/

2007-07-22 05:35:59 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-22 04:53:09 · 15 answers · asked by JBWPLGCSE 5

i am so tired of politicians who have infected me with this horrible disease and i know there is no relief in site, months to go until the elections for it to grow and expand. it is almost as bad as the cancer i have.

is there no politician or elected leader that honestly thinks of the good of the cournty rather than their own agenda and just trying to prove how the current administration has failed us?

the surge was deemed a failure before it started yet i hear no suggestions for a valid solution. i am sick of hearing about all the problems and sick of never hearing of a solution to our sad state of affairs.

i am sick because i see no heroes on the horizon and it should scare us all because we really are at war and the world has a vested interest in the outcome.

2007-07-22 02:59:11 · 6 answers · asked by ? 7

1. naural resources (the beach, views)

2. infrastructures (buildings, airport, sewereage system, etc)

3. transportation

4. people's hospitality

2007-07-22 02:32:41 · 3 answers · asked by max 2

kindly explain each...? thanks!

2007-07-22 02:17:11 · 9 answers · asked by james p 1

and start working for the good of america. because at the rate they are going they may have a surprise in nov of 2008. my wish is that in 2008 everybody votes out the incombent. dem or rep and ind..

2007-07-22 02:06:18 · 5 answers · asked by tentieooo 3

2007-07-22 01:39:25 · 15 answers · asked by jettacop 1

and if so, and your not physically capable of holding a job. Why aren't you working?

2007-07-22 01:32:12 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Provide an example, either real or hypothetical

2007-07-22 01:19:30 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-22 01:10:38 · 4 answers · asked by Sivasami A 1

Very fat people who are lazy, will not work, eat to much, and have lots of health problems because of it?

I Know, not every fat person is lazy, so don't start with the polically correct B.S.

2007-07-22 01:10:28 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

i cant seem to find the answers. pls do help

2007-07-22 00:14:59 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-22 00:14:48 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-21 23:54:57 · 9 answers · asked by michaelsoft_1 1

2007-07-21 23:42:43 · 1 answers · asked by tin-tin 1

George Bush is a chairman that is sentimentally committed in a failed policy that does not function and _____________________.

2007-07-21 22:51:52 · 14 answers · asked by kittana! 2

If something major had happened while Bush was under that anesthetic and Cheney was acting president, who would've received credit for the handling of such an event, Bush or Cheney?

2007-07-21 17:13:11 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-21 17:11:11 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-21 16:39:20 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Because you KNOW the "War on Terror" is actually a "War for Oil"!

2007-07-21 15:51:31 · 7 answers · asked by never_vote_democrat 2

2007-07-21 15:42:06 · 13 answers · asked by hwinnum 7

2007-07-21 14:23:23 · 7 answers · asked by Mr Maggot 1

I've always thought that the President went to a hospital, such as Bethesda Memorial. I know that at least in the past, they always went to a hospital, so why would Bush use Camp David for a surgical procedure?

Does Camp David have surgical facilities?

Does this seem odd to anyone else that the President is having surgery at Camp David today, on a Saturday?

2007-07-21 13:22:02 · 9 answers · asked by Searcher 7

Doesn't make sense to me, when Majority of the south is Black and Majority of North and West are white, yet democrats usually win Northern states. On CNN and FOX polls usually say that 70-80% of blacks vote democratic. What do you think?

I understand why TX(state I live in) are Republican because Majority of people that live here are so called "Christian" white, and wealthy, But what about deep southern states (where there is a large concentration of African Americans)?

2007-07-21 12:18:08 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

History has been created when a Hindu prayer was recited at the opening of the US Senate in Washington DC on July 12.

Three Christian protestors were removed from the U.S. Senate chamber’s observation gallery Thursday when they disrupted the morning prayer — being delivered for the first time in history by a Hindu chaplain.

What is happening to this country???

2007-07-21 12:16:18 · 8 answers · asked by Jimmy the Cricket 3

When I looked at the numbers last month, the Gallup Poll showed President Bush's job approval was at 32 percent, and Congress was at 24 percent. Could things get any worse? Of course they can. Never underestimate the power of the Democratic Party to self-destruct. The first job approval numbers for July are in and the Reuters/Zogby Poll shows Bush at 34 percent, Congress at 14 percent. Under Democratic leadership, Congress has gone from the brink of the abyss and leaped. Whee!

2007-07-21 10:47:43 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-21 10:03:47 · 4 answers · asked by ToYou,Too! 5

2007-07-21 09:35:30 · 6 answers · asked by Adolf Schmichael 5

Section 3 - Treason Note

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

So does this mean that helping terriost supporting country's with food, water, education is treasing.

2007-07-21 08:32:21 · 4 answers · asked by Michael A 2