Government - January 2007

If you would be for, why

if you would be against, why not

2007-01-06 15:05:21 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

I do!! Proud to be an american!! Haters don't bother commenting!!!

2007-01-06 14:49:11 · 15 answers · asked by Lauren. 4

There is strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757, as our government claims. Listen to this retired General, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon...?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine. The engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them. The deep 18 foot hole was most probably made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.
http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm

Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. The official word is they died in the hijacked planes on 9/11.
http://tomflocco.com/fs/WitnessesLink.htm

The Jet engine(s) found may be key to identifying what type of aircraft hit the Pentagon: At the very least, they help determine a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head" have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine. The P&W JT8D engine has been used on the smaller Boeing 727 as well as a retrofit for the A-3 Skywarior. Two P&W JT8D's do not provide enough thrust to get a Boeing 757 off the ground much less sufficient power to perform the military precision maneuvers the aircraft in question did.
http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://www.karlschwarz.com/02-02-05_Schwarz.pdf

A photograph of a cracked windshield found at the crash site strongly resembles the top canopy glass found on the Skywarrior: No windows of this shape are found on a Boeing 757.
http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/911Pentagon.htm

The landing gear is one part found in the crash site that may be linked to a Boeing 757. It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need to be replaced with something still available.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/084.html

A geometric analysis can show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon is under 85 feet long and therefore too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 feet long. An A-3 Skywarrior is 76 feet 4 inches long. See geometric analysis: also see revision note under comments.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avt4N5qfsIKkwbXeL7iLXmPsy6IX?qid=20061122203115AAj8XR6

2007-01-06 14:39:54 · 25 answers · asked by Joe_Pardy 5

What are the bad points on George W Bush, and if there are any good points what are they?

2007-01-06 14:39:26 · 23 answers · asked by Duct Girlie 2

Why can't the Democrats just take the steps to halt funding for the Iraq war and have him impeached so he can face the justice that he misguidedly dished out to others?

2007-01-06 14:21:51 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Should political candidates be made to disclose secrets of organization the have been involved with?

2007-01-06 13:38:14 · 10 answers · asked by mumtaz 4

The Senate is technically tied, 49 Dems, 49 Republicans, 2 independant. You usually need 60 votes in the Senate to pass anything. In the House, Dems have 233 (53%), Republicans 202(46%), but if anything passes the house, then the Senate can block it. Not very overwhelming to me.

2007-01-06 13:35:10 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

As most informed citizens know by now, President Bush is an admitted member of The Order of Skull and Bones, one of the most secretive societies in the world. When asked about it, he (as do all the other members) quickly ends the conversation by stating that he can't say anything about it. What do you think of our Commander in Chief having a divided allegiance to both the State and a non-governmental organization that we know nothing about? (A quick note: This has nothing to do with 9/11 conspiracies. I realize that will be most people's gut reaction, as would mine, but that is not the case. My question is what it is; there are no intended implications regarding an "inside job.")

2007-01-06 13:08:44 · 14 answers · asked by Leroy Johnson 5

2007-01-06 12:59:38 · 6 answers · asked by Ramon C 1

I need landmark supreme court cases that pertain to the second amendment with link that would be great. I have looked all over and only found miller vs us. Can somebody please help me?

2007-01-06 12:42:56 · 3 answers · asked by Angela. 3

Why should people be in ranks? Why cant everyone get along and work for the benefit of everyone else?

2007-01-06 12:04:40 · 14 answers · asked by Terry The Terrible 5

I have read tons of articles about it but i still don't understand what it was all about. Can someone explain it plz.

2007-01-06 11:26:24 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Say a volcano made a brand new country in the Atlantic ocean - about the size of ireland. This country has since been populated by plants and animals, but no people live there. You lead a group of settlers to found a brand new nation. How would you rule it?

Specifically - would you have socialist elements in your government?

Would you have the death penalty - and what for?

Would you have elections, or make yourself president for life?

Would you persue nuclear weapons?

What would your foreign policy be, and your stance towards other nations?

What would your immigration policy be?

Plus anything else you can think of

2007-01-06 10:53:05 · 9 answers · asked by Mordent 7

2007-01-06 10:46:51 · 6 answers · asked by ♥ 6

can someone give me an easier translation then the actual text.

2007-01-06 10:31:22 · 5 answers · asked by Angela. 3

2007-01-06 10:22:33 · 8 answers · asked by dude 5

We are talking money Here!!!!!

2007-01-06 10:20:19 · 8 answers · asked by Billy M 4

A "Agreement memo" was signed by the White House and Secret Service the day after (May 17th) a Washington group asked a federal judge to impose sanctions on the Secret Service in a dispute over White House visitor logs for Abramoff, it
states that all entry and exit data on White House visitors belongs to the White House as presidential records rather than to the Secret Service as agency records. Therefore, the agreement states, the material is not subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act.
The government is also continuing to erode privacy as it pursues the war on terrorism. The latest effort is the FBI’s attempt to make sure it can monitor voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) phone calls.

U.S. President George W. Bush has quietly claimed sweeping new powers to open Americans' mail without a court warrant, the New York Daily News reported on Friday.

In a move that could spark new fears about the administration's infringement of personal privacy,

2007-01-06 10:15:57 · 8 answers · asked by clevelandrocksgirl 3

2007-01-06 10:01:43 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-06 09:55:43 · 7 answers · asked by Bryan B 1

Is it right for us to go around the world forcing Democratic systems of governments on nations when clearly they are not even close to being perfect yet?

Isn't the the democratic system really useless anyway I mean we only really vote between the lesser of two evils in most cases?

Aren't we preventing possible political advancement by culling other nations political development before it evolves.

Maybe Iraq may have evolved a system of perfect political government if left to naturally evolve. Afteralll it is pretty much accepted that Civilisation began in that area of the world, who are America and their infantile civilisation to tell them how to run a country?

2007-01-06 09:54:54 · 3 answers · asked by Bohdisatva 3

Is the modern presidency is more powerful than the framers of the Constitution intended it to be? Why or why not?

2007-01-06 09:42:20 · 9 answers · asked by ? 1

he did bad he paid. but this stinky president bush sends people to iraq and get them killed to they are BOTH KILLERS IN COLD BLOOD.bush should not put his nose in other peoples buisness. he is not president of the world.bush is stupid and he sucks

2007-01-06 09:40:59 · 11 answers · asked by ticachic 3

No leader would want to leave the historions thinking that his leadership was a failure.So look for the president,and vice president to change the 4 year term with the supreme court.

2007-01-06 09:19:53 · 14 answers · asked by comicbookdrawer 1

rule britannia

2007-01-06 09:19:39 · 13 answers · asked by stevenage_pagan 1

2007-01-06 09:09:45 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why don't more Americans know they have never been apart from British control?

London is the financial Capital of the world and the bank of England controls every Americans life, but they still insist they are free!

Always confused me, why are they are oblivious!

2007-01-06 09:07:14 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

For an example food stamps, jobcorps, and etc.

2007-01-06 09:01:21 · 6 answers · asked by Smile Everyday 1

Fox viewers think that Iraq is payback for 9/11. Everyone else knows there is no connection.

However, we are now to the point where deaths of America soldiers in combat will exceed the number of Americans who died in 9/11.

Forget the fact that the official count of soldiers only includes combat deaths and not all other types.

For those that support the war -- how many deaths mean the cost was too high? Is it infinite?

2007-01-06 08:57:12 · 7 answers · asked by Murphy 3

2007-01-06 07:15:37 · 1 answers · asked by CeeLee 1