English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why can't the Democrats just take the steps to halt funding for the Iraq war and have him impeached so he can face the justice that he misguidedly dished out to others?

2007-01-06 14:21:51 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

OOPS, spelling mistake, I was supposed to type Walker.

2007-01-06 15:19:12 · update #1

10 answers

You really should show some respect for the office of the President of the United States... your question is beyond childish....

2007-01-06 14:28:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

they can and will do this...and the Republicans should stand back and let them do it! Imagine how bad things will get over the next two years! The thing to do is let the rabid leftwingers run their mouths and then follow their directions.....let it all go down the toilet.....afterall...we are just supporting the 12 million Iraqis who voted in a free and open election for a free government. So let's take the position of the democratics...abandon those brave people....we can hide and spend the money on National Public Radio

2007-01-06 14:53:25 · answer #2 · answered by Mike C 3 · 1 1

Nancy Pelosi was bought over by the Iszraeli lobby.

2007-01-06 19:32:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You mean the war they all voted for?

wake up out of your fantasy land dream, and start looking at reality.

2007-01-06 14:30:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

THE DEMOCRATS WOULD BE THE BAD GUYS, IF THEY STOP FUNDING FOR THE WAR. IT WOULD HURT OUR TROOPS. BECAUSE OF THE EQUIPMENT, AND THE SAFETY EQUIPMENT THE TROOPS NEEDS., MANY OTHER THING. THEY CAN'T DO IT.

2007-01-06 14:49:53 · answer #5 · answered by bettys 4 · 2 1

Because he hasn't committed a crime.
They have no grounds for impeachment.
And the Democrats all voted for this war - except one. They aren't going to stop the war in Iraq. They just lied about it so that they would get elected.

2007-01-06 14:24:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6 4

they can stop some of the money but he can get it through other means that they cant control...and if we impeach him on all the multitude of things he's done then we'd have President Cheney take his place. I'm not ready for that nightmare.

2007-01-06 14:24:49 · answer #7 · answered by Haven17 5 · 2 5

huh,this aint england,we fight for whats ours here,the dems only won because the people didnt get it,but the dems will and already are showing their true colors and I figure in the first 100 days,most will start seeing the damage they are doing

2007-01-06 14:25:35 · answer #8 · answered by stygianwolfe 7 · 6 4

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070107/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_iraq

because they are soiling their pants because they know they are damned if they do!

2007-01-06 14:23:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

If it only worked that way..............

2007-01-06 14:29:23 · answer #10 · answered by Bubbles 5 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers