English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Government - November 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Government

I just recovered my US citizenship, I'm a wife living in Mexico with no income. Should I file for the IRS, shoul I get my social security number

2006-11-16 23:16:12 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-16 23:00:29 · 25 answers · asked by rajeev_yerasi 1

Also imagine that there are about 20 kids in your class and 8 of them a bullies and cause problems for everyone. YOu are the biggest strongest kid in the class. Would you take action against they bullies when they are roughing up the weaker kids?


Similarly should the United States act in the same way? (protecting weaker countries and peoples from hostiles)

2006-11-16 22:44:22 · 7 answers · asked by sshazzam 6

2006-11-16 22:25:12 · 28 answers · asked by jody75 1

i know Liberia recently voted for a new president who is a woman but i have forgotten the name of this woman. i also want to know the number of Member of Parliament Liberia has if possible their names and presently how is the nation like.

2006-11-16 21:45:32 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

British politics is in a shambles! The parties don't listen to the people, and a huge amount of us just don't want to vote for any of them! Here's the answer! Tell me what you think.

www.blahparty.org

2006-11-16 20:17:57 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Political parties need funding. If some egotistic, wealthy person is vain enough to pay millions just so they can have a title in front of their name, why not let them. If they did`nt donate it, it would probably have to come out of the public purse. Is`nt it a big waste of police time, when there are much more important things they could be doing.

2006-11-16 19:52:39 · 9 answers · asked by David H 6

I've found that anytime you simply criticize the Israeli government, you are accused of being anti-semitic. But is this fair?

2006-11-16 17:34:40 · 9 answers · asked by fortwynt 2

.
.
.
Feel free to explain, but keep your explanations simple so people who think Bush is innocent can comprehend it.
.
.
.

2006-11-16 17:32:04 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

.
.
.
I will NOTE rate the answers that are kept to a simplke YES or NO.
.
.
.

2006-11-16 17:26:32 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-16 17:19:17 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-16 17:18:08 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-16 17:12:23 · 7 answers · asked by paresh p 1

Did you know there was a new Internet Browser, based on Firefox, that masks your IP address with each request you make to the Internet? PLUS, it runs on a USB drive so all history, cookies and cached files reside on the REMOVABLE USB drive?

One could probably use such a device to organize their thougts without having to worry about thier ideas being stolen by the likes of Yahho, Microsoft or any of the other New World Order players where personal privacy is non-existent.

All you have to do is to GOOGLE "torpark" and you can then download it.

What do you think? Could something like this protect your privacy?

2006-11-16 16:37:52 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

electronics
cars
tele communication
defense

2006-11-16 16:25:52 · 7 answers · asked by Prashanth S 1

Personally, I think this is MORE than just government to civilian Intimidation and Propaganda. I believe it is an attempt to get people to start believing that a trial where ONE MAN or WOMAN judge decides your guilt or innocence is BETTER than having a jury of 12 people to pool from for a concensus.

You tell me. Is this JUST Intimidation and Propaganda or is this MUCH MUCH worse?

Please view the trailer. It is the TOP LINK in the body of the page.

http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1808734572/trailer

2006-11-16 16:24:24 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is it enviornmentally-friendly?

Love Jack

2006-11-16 15:51:12 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

thank you

2006-11-16 15:50:58 · 1 answers · asked by College student 1

Can you give me the background of the constitution?
Does the Constitution serve people?
3 strong supporting answers + Thesis(if u can make one)

2006-11-16 15:20:36 · 6 answers · asked by skysky 2

My friend seems not been honest in his business dealings with me. I gave him a substantial sum of money but his response to me is not favourable.

2006-11-16 14:49:06 · 4 answers · asked by bashah1939 4

2006-11-16 13:46:36 · 10 answers · asked by Tyler S 1

okie dokie everybody... question question. I'm looking up for a paper that i have to write things about the supremacy clause of the Constitution. Don't give up on me yet! ;) lol... alrighty... does anyone know in which ways the supremacy clause of the Constitution anticipated some of the problems associated with federalism???

2006-11-16 13:38:05 · 1 answers · asked by uhhsure8701 2

I think it is ridiculous how they "can't deliver checks" to people who have moved and changed their address; but if it was reversed and that person OWED money... you know the Gov't would track them down.

Are you on the list of people who still deserve money from the US Gov't?
Follow this lick and click "WHERES MY REFUND"
http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=164304,00.html

2006-11-16 13:26:41 · 9 answers · asked by Joe Somebody 6

Are the democrates going to challenge the presadents polices?Or are they going to be cowards?

2006-11-16 13:09:39 · 10 answers · asked by jam1577 2

If our govt is innocent of involvement in 9/11, then why not release the videos confiscated by the FBI and PROVE it and UNITE the country instead of causing us division on a scale never before seen?

There are THREE known videos of the Pentagon attack. The Sheraton Inn, the gas station and the Virginia Dept of Transportation films. All of those cameras tapes were confiscated and never released.

This is not to mention that we're talking about the Pentagon where there is a camera every 100 feet. The video proof of what happened at the Pentagon is more than adequate, but our government will not release the footage.

I believe to my core, that in light of the conspiracy controversy, it would be prudent for PROOF to be released that our government WAS NOT INVOLVED in the TERROR on 9/11/2001.

I can think of NO good reason other than the govt protecting itself, that these tapes are not release.

Instead of attacking me, answer the question.

2006-11-16 13:04:59 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers