.
.
.
Feel free to explain, but keep your explanations simple so people who think Bush is innocent can comprehend it.
.
.
.
2006-11-16 17:32:04 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Robin W. If you are looking to me to condem our troops for following orders, well, you are looking the wrong direction. As I state in my profile, I fully support our troops.
Also note, I do not view our soldiers as terrorists. I view them as YOUNG men and women placed in a HORRIBLY UNJUST situation by a VERY EVIL, SATAN-LIKE, so-called "man" who STOLE elections to be in the position to MASSACRE innocent people for profit.
But NO, I do NOT condem our troops for fighting as all they are doing is what they HAVE to do for ANY nation to survive. And that is to follow orders.
Hopefully, the order will never be given to kill MORE citizens like the POLITICIANS did on 9/11.
2006-11-16 17:48:28 · update #1
The entire Bush Administration, all of Congress who voted with him, as well as the Senate, all outside agency sources AND all news media who protected him, should get LIFE in prison.
LIFE
Not death, but LIFE.
The world will begin to heal as mankind takes a step forward in the name of itself. We do NOT need to execute the evil ones once they've been convicted through our CONSTITUTIONAL legal system. The conviction and LIFE behind bars will kill two birds with one stone; tyranny and punishment.
That is the solution to our problems. We just raise the bar on civility.
2006-11-16 19:47:35 · update #2
Yes, crimes against his own countrymen!
2006-11-16 17:39:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Yes. He should be criminally prosecuted for
1. violating the Geneva Conventions and International law
( invading a country we should not have invaded )
2, lying to the American people.
3. Taking America into war under false pretenses..knowingly!
( those 2 are big No No's in our Constitution )
4. Guantanamo Bay, and Abu Gharheib prison in Iraq....allowing torture as a form of interrogation
5. profitting from this war we are in..... he is a client of the Carlyle group. The carlyle group is an investment firm that invests in this country's defense and war materials. When we go to war, guess who profits from that....??? The carlyle group and their clients.....George W. Bush
6. Election Fraud/ Voting Fraud
7. Illegal Wiretapping - NSA program
2006-11-17 01:49:49 · answer #2 · answered by Blondie* 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Most definitely.
Please look at the answer to a question posted earlier. It is long, but well worth the read. Jon J was very thorough.
Look for the question: 'Since taking office how many times has Bush vetoed a bill. What was the issues of this bill.'
It is too long for some to comprehend. Ignorance is not bliss.
2006-11-17 02:01:04 · answer #3 · answered by Schona 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes! Bill Clinton was prosecuted for getting a headjob & lying about it. Bush Lied about weapons of mass destruction in order to send our troops to war. Thousands of our troops have been killed. They are both obviosly liars. They are politicians so We can't really blame them for that! But whats worse, getting a headjob or sending our troops to die over a complete lie?
2006-11-17 02:30:31 · answer #4 · answered by Charlie J 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, but for the major crimes he'd have to be extrodited first, especially as the US seems to be loath to bring him to justice themselves.
Then comes the difficult issue of which country has the most right to punish him.
Is it Britain, he played them all for fools getting Blair to lie for him.
Is it Australia, first dragging them along to war and then accusing corruption amongst the Australian Wheat Board for not playing ball.
Is it Iraq for exchanging their murdersome dictator and his allies for an even larger murdersome bunch of marines.
And of these and more who has enough political sway to push for extradition.
There are a few practical issues to work out first before prosecution can go ahead.
2006-11-17 01:52:06 · answer #5 · answered by Paul C 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
Violation of 18 USC 2511, for warrantless wiretaps in violation of FISA (50 USC 180x). Publicly admitted; confirmed by federal courts.
Violation of 18 USC 2441, for war crimes. Publicly admitted, and confirmed by the US Supreme Court. Though, this might be tricky as Congress just made it retroactively not a crime, even though it was illegal at the time he did it.
We can start there, since those have already been proven. Details below, for anyone who actually wants to read the laws.
2006-11-17 01:39:45 · answer #6 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
he is to be tried for war crimes in Iraq . bush invaded Iraq under the pretext that it had wmd but there were no wmds. instead of withdrawing forces, he caused for the deaths of 6,00,000 innocent Iraqis. before us invaded Iraq, there were no Islamic terrorists and no sectarian violence. now Iraq has become a hot bed for religious terrorists and sectarian violence. if Saddam responsible for 148 people, then why not bush for 6,00,000 people?
2006-11-17 01:44:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
Yes, for letting terrorist in Iraq, killing innocent people, and putting their leader in prison soon to be hung, and the invasion of Iraq.
2006-11-17 01:42:56 · answer #8 · answered by Robin W 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I hate Bush, but can think of no actual crime to prosecute him for.
2006-11-17 01:40:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Isn't there a law protecting the mentally challenged from criminal prosecution?I could have sworn there was.
2006-11-17 01:42:22 · answer #10 · answered by miraclehand2020 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
No. And since I am apparently an idiot (according to you) I'll keep it simple. He has broken no laws to be prosecuted for.
BTW: I don't think you are the brightest star in the sky either.
2006-11-17 01:38:26 · answer #11 · answered by Cinner 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋