Elections - April 2007

I mean have any of you ever heard him talk?He makes a fool out of himself and our country every time he steps up to the microphone!So lets get the vote....

2007-04-04 15:03:22 · 18 answers · asked by Michelle 2

He comes off like the damn Anti-Christ. He looks like he's buried a few bodies in the Utah salt flats.

I think some human sacrifices have taken place in his presences.

That guy scares me. He seems to want to carry on Bush's agenda of a New World Order.

2007-04-04 14:46:39 · 9 answers · asked by ScooterLibby 3

2007-04-04 14:34:33 · 19 answers · asked by Thomas M 2

The Constitution guarantees the freedom of speech but does that mean a zillionaire can spend billions to get his friends or lackys elected to public office. Should it take $200,000,000 + just to run for President and how can an honest and honorable candidate accumulate that kind of money without compromising their morals?

2007-04-04 13:43:19 · 11 answers · asked by bak2rak 1

...on a radio interview a few minutes ago [BBC Radio 4] a commentator said "He [Obama] has a real chance now that he's got a bulging warchest and can build an effective machine."

Money, advertising, lobbying...
Hmm. How much is left of the ideal of people choosing the best candidate, compared to them being spun into choosing the best-presented or least-smeared candidate?

2007-04-04 10:43:22 · 2 answers · asked by Pedestal 42 7

Is there like a website out here where you can look up the presidential candidates and compare them on certain issues? I like to see where they stand so I can decide who to vote for in 2008.

2007-04-04 09:59:41 · 6 answers · asked by Landshark 1

2007-04-04 08:57:08 · 3 answers · asked by Firesidechat 2

2007-04-04 08:27:04 · 33 answers · asked by urban guru 2

Cattle futures?
Whitewater?
Travel office firings?
FBI files?

There's too many to list.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_Clinton_controversies

2007-04-04 07:58:53 · 9 answers · asked by Matt 5

I think Hillary and gang is about to get down and dirty with this campaign. Hillary is like the wicked witch and she's not going to let anyone stand in her way.... it takes me back to that list of 'missing folks'.... anyway....

This will give the supporters that are still with Hillary an opportunity to see this WITCH in action. Hold on....

2007-04-04 07:06:15 · 19 answers · asked by Stealth 2

Why are they still here?

I really want to know. If this country is so bad, why aren't people leaving in droves?

2007-04-04 06:22:51 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Forget about party affiliations. What issues are important to YOU as an American (or concerned citizen)? (No bashing, please.)

2007-04-04 06:00:16 · 12 answers · asked by Jazz In 10-Forward 4

2007-04-04 05:41:58 · 25 answers · asked by slippy_j99 1

I have asked many times and in many ways what the democratic plan was for the war on terror. Now I have my answer: the are going to define it away!!!

http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2007/04/military_gwot_democrats_070403w/

2007-04-04 05:34:49 · 8 answers · asked by Jacob W 7

2007-04-04 05:33:38 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-04 03:30:46 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Under the Logan act

2007-04-04 01:30:07 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

to build an enormous mosque costing an estimated 100M in the docklands. What do you think about it? Wouldn't it be better to spend the money on a new hospital or improved transport facilities??
BIGGER THAN ST PAULS!!!
The plan is for the mosque to be so big that people flying in from all over the world for the 2012 Olympics will it see it as the biggest landmark in London , bigger than St Pauls, Westminster Abbey or Wembley Stadium,
Take a second to cast your vote in The Evening Standard on-line poll to determine public opinion about whether a mega mosque should be built for the Olympics.
a multi faith church would be far better and what would you rather spend 100 million on
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/poll/poll-18791-details/ques-18669-id/%C2%A3100m+mosque%3A+Vote+now/poll.do

2007-04-03 23:43:55 · 16 answers · asked by sylvie c 4

2007-04-03 18:42:06 · 13 answers · asked by Matthew T 1

To add just a bit, the Dems' now control the House and Senate. The Dems' are also stepping up hard. So, if their plans pass, and things continue to fail. Will that be a set back for the Dem' nominee? Reps' can easily say that things went bad because of the House and Senate controlled by the Dems'. But, if the Dems' sit back as oppose to act out against the war, could that cost them too in the contexts of "We elected them to change things and they didn't"? 2008 will be great. With the right political swing, either one of the things I said could happen. What do you think?

2007-04-03 18:06:53 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

STOP!!!!! please

2007-04-03 18:04:05 · 7 answers · asked by Deztini! 3

2007-04-03 17:45:42 · 8 answers · asked by clarevale 2

Do you know that the majority of the so-called "INDIAN FORWARD COMMUNITY" don't have even two square meals are living without sufficient food, clothing and shelter. Most of the so-called forward communities are so poor that they don't have sufficient food, clothing and shelter. Till date, they have not asked for any reservations in Government services or IIT or IIM.

To conclude, EITHER FORWARD OR BACKWARD MOST OF THE INDIANS ARE BACKWARD & POOR in India.

2007-04-03 17:17:47 · 17 answers · asked by Indian wizard 2

If Hillary Clinton is elected and sworn into office... What do you think she would do to this country while on her "monthly friend?"

2007-04-03 16:58:56 · 8 answers · asked by kl0wnie 3

When you vote for President next year, will you be more concerned about his/her views on
#1) IRAQ;
#2) a national HEALTH Plan; or,
#3) our nation's ECONOMY?

-

2007-04-03 16:56:34 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-03 16:46:27 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-03 16:46:11 · 11 answers · asked by scriptkiddie85 1

2007-04-03 15:10:36 · 16 answers · asked by BooBoo 1

Suppose there were two planet Earths. Suppose that Democrats completely ran one without opposition and Republicans completely ran the other without opposition. What would each planet be like after a couple of hundred years? I'm interested in knowing other people's perspective on a creative but absurd philosophical question. Suppose you could visit and evaluate each but would have to eventually make a choice of one or the other for permanent residence. What would they be like after a couple of millenniums and which would you choose? Thanks!

2007-04-03 15:00:53 · 6 answers · asked by NJRich 2

Well probably not this time but it just might be for 012.

2007-04-03 14:17:41 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous