English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Well probably not this time but it just might be for 012.

2007-04-03 14:17:41 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

14 answers

Sure - I mean why not?

2008 already belongs to Hillary - though I thought the constitution said something about two terms in the White House after FDR won it four times (though passing away very early in the fourth, or maybe before it even began: curse my memory of history!)

Then in 2012 the people will be fed up with Madame president, and since no one else has the money to put up other than the Clinton and Bush clans - then good ole' Jeb will be the next president to keep that dynasty going.

In 2020 after two narrow elections with John Edwards and a very, very old John Kerry, Jeb will finally step down. His succeedor? None other than (drum roll PLEASE!)

CHELSEA CLINTON

The future is bright indeed.

I vote for Jesus - but since He is not running I hope I can vote for Obama in 2008.

2007-04-03 14:35:39 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Indignant 4 · 1 0

The Bush family desperately wants the Bush dynasty to survive, but they now know 2008 isn't the time. They need the Democrats to win because they're painfully aware how George W. Bush's administration has positioned this nation for the greatest economic depression in U.S. history - much greater than 1929. They need the Democrats in office so the Democrats can be blamed for this disaster. Then, they'll put Jeb in place for the 2012 elections, branding him as the 'savior' that can salvage the country and save it from total economic collapse. -RKO- 04/03/07

2007-04-03 14:56:35 · answer #2 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0 0

i think of Jeb will evaluate a run interior the close to destiny, however no longer in 2008. He might watch for the main appropriate 2d - in all probability 2012 or 2016. Jeb is hyper aggressive along with his brother. He thinks he can do extra efficient, he loves a project, and he's have been given the rigidity, ambition and smarts to do it. in assessment to his brother, Jeb is a complete workaholic who quite is conscious the minutiate of coverage and can argue notably effectively with newshounds and different politicians. OTOH, Jeb's self-assuredness and self assurance is additionally a vulnerable spot for him - he have faith's he's the best guy interior the room and this might are available the time of as conceitedness in public. It follows that he's not any longer lots of a consensus builder (my way or the line), no longer in assessment to brother George, and that has come to chew him interior the at the back of interior the previous. the place I disagree with you is on whether a Jeb presidency could be reliable for the rustic. IMO, Jeb notably lots shares an identical political ideology as his brother. They the two love tax cuts to a knee-jerk degree, they cater to the properly-off, they love privitization of government applications, and maximum heavily - they don't have faith in government transparency (Jeb watered down the implementation of light regulations in Florida). They the two have faith in a triumphing in any respect fees technique of partisan politics and could behave in a punitive way in the direction of their political fighters. in short, Jeb could be a extra efficient George W, which i think of could be a disaster for the rustic.

2016-10-20 23:08:13 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I have a better idea. Let Jeb finish his brother's term.
He can't possibly do a worse job.
Then we are done with Bushes forever! Hallelujah!

2007-04-03 14:30:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Although he's not a bad as his brother, I never want to see another bush in the white house!

2007-04-03 14:22:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

We don't need another Bush or Clinton in the White House for at least another...

Hell, we don't need one ever.

2007-04-03 14:39:16 · answer #6 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 1 0

The American Revolution was fought to stop that sort of thing.

2007-04-03 14:24:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Wanna bet?

2007-04-03 14:21:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

shut up. there is no way a bush would ever win again. bush is a failure.

2007-04-03 14:24:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

awww MAN! You just made me throwup. All over my laptop. Don't you ever utter those words again...

2007-04-03 14:22:59 · answer #10 · answered by pinkluxe 3 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers