2007-04-04 05:33:38 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
If you really want a ticket to help unite the country, Ms. Clinton would be best served by Sen. John McCain. We could take Hillary's liberal stances and mix them with McCain's conservative policies ALONG with his true, verified military experience. Whoever gets the privilege of being the "Leader of the Free World" needs to put partisan politics in the trash and use true bipartisanship to get law makers from both sides of the isle to do what is best for this country, abroad and at home.
2007-04-04 06:46:14 · answer #1 · answered by crazycaviecool 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There would be a great deal of historical value and appeal with Hillary/Obama Dem ticket. With Obama as VP, this would be a great set up for him as a junior congressman to work towards a potential pres bid after Hillary's term(s) as President are over.
2007-04-04 05:47:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have been given to questioning immediately approximately Hillary's run for President in 2016 and desperate she could decide for New Jersey Governor Chris Christy as her vp candidate---the mixture could take the rustic by a great hurricane (no connection with hurricane Sandy right here). President Obama made an somewhat clever decision whilst he (a) picked long-time Senator Joe Biden as his vp, and (b) whilst he then asked his former political rival Hillary Clinton to be his Secretary of State. McCain did no longer "decide for" the unlucky and unqualified Palin---she replaced into compelled upon him. Palin's ties to the D.C.-based far-far-rightwing CULT of many names The kinfolk/teenagers With A undertaking (a.ok.a., background beginning place, The Federation, C highway residing house, and so on.) by her pentecostal church in Wasilla is why she replaced into picked---to thrill the biblical-literalist nutjob extremist GOP base. John McCain had had to decide for his long-time chum Joe Liberman as his working mate, yet replaced into advised he might desire to no longer---so McCain buckled decrease than.
2016-10-21 00:25:38 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm hoping Obama gets the nomination, but "if" Hillary does, i see her working with Edwards.
Hillary and Obama wouldn't seem to have good chemistry. Obama wouldn't be able to take the back seat to Hillary, but I think Edwards could.
2007-04-04 05:38:53 · answer #4 · answered by Diggy 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think either would be a quality candidate for V.P. however just think of the history it would make if a black man joined a white woman in a bid for the two highest offices in the land. I am 61 and I never thought I would see this day. It is a giant step forward for the country. .
2007-04-04 05:38:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Neither. We need Obama to stay in the Senate. The VP will be Bill Richardson. Bank on it!
2007-04-04 05:38:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For "When" Hillary becomes the nominee a good running mate for her would be Bigfoot or the Chupacabra...because they don't exist and her chance of her getting the nomination is about as much as me finding Bigfoot...
2007-04-04 05:55:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
After watching the 04 Vice Presidential Debate between Edwards and Cheney, it is clear that Edwards is definitely not a leader.
2007-04-04 05:36:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think John Edwards would make a fine President
I think he is the only candidate that will not polarize the party
I wish he would have won before
2007-04-04 05:46:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary will be the first candidate to NOT have a running mate, because she is MORE than qualified to do both jobs!
(that's sarcasm, in case anyone missed it...)
A good VP for hitlery would be Rosie, because Rosie would make hitlery look moderate by comparison, and maybe slimmer by comparison (maybe. those pants suits do nothing for hitlery).
2007-04-04 05:38:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋