Politics & Government - 19 August 2006

2006-08-19 09:16:05 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

2006-08-19 09:15:02 · 3 answers · asked by lowonbrain 2 in Other - Politics & Government

Can anyone give a true, non ranting, fact based answer to my question?

What are the fundamental pro's and con's of the act?

If you are not doing something wrong (illegal or terrorst acts) why should you be concerned about it?

2006-08-19 09:13:33 · 11 answers · asked by Millsy 3 in Government

We get our rear ends beat everyday in Iraq and I'm wondering when we will start to eat crow meat? The Insurgents are making the USA look like fools.

2006-08-19 09:13:24 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

If they aren't going to use the NHS as much, couldn't they get a reduction in the amount of tax they pay? Wouldn't this stimulate competitive pricing?

2006-08-19 09:13:22 · 9 answers · asked by Oracle Of Delphi 4 in Other - Politics & Government

When they can do it by car and just stopped for a few seconds by a border agent that ask some questions about the reason of his/her visit and leave him/her come here?
I don't get it why they prefer to cross the whole river or desert instead of that?

2006-08-19 09:10:20 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

2006-08-19 09:09:34 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

I am not even religious or superstitious. Is this a matter for the Vatican?

2006-08-19 09:09:05 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-08-19 09:09:01 · 12 answers · asked by Lantern 3 in Military

I believe national security is the right of a nation to secure any resources in another country, they need to "survive". Whether they have enough in their own country or not!

2006-08-19 09:08:44 · 4 answers · asked by Mila 2 in Government

I heard it from a friend of mine, but i don't think that makes sense.

2006-08-19 09:08:33 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-08-19 09:05:38 · 29 answers · asked by missdiddy2002 1 in Law Enforcement & Police

they want to use the road and insist on having those stupid lanes for themselves so shouldn,t they have to pay for it

2006-08-19 09:03:29 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

When presented with something they wont take the time to read it, even though it comes from one of their own,. and refer to it as , well nothing because they are afraid to face it.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?i...

http://www.newamericancentury.org/...

http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/nau/...

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/articl...

2006-08-19 09:03:05 · 18 answers · asked by Charles Dobson Focus on the Fam 2 in Politics

2006-08-19 09:01:09 · 2 answers · asked by catchup 3 in Military

PLease sent me a link to the web site you can obtain this info?

2006-08-19 09:00:58 · 9 answers · asked by matt m 1 in Civic Participation

2006-08-19 08:59:52 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

What makes you think that it can't be used to ignore the 2nd amendment?

p.s.
guns don't do much against tanks, missles and a well trained blacops group.

2006-08-19 08:58:36 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

People are dieing walking from mexico. why cant america give us a bus ride into america and across aztlan so we can get towhere we work. america has no problem giving us a bus ride back to the boarder. america will also spend money to send there children to school on bus but some kids live in the same city to where they go to school at. this seems like a waste of money when people are dieing trying to come to america

2006-08-19 08:57:19 · 25 answers · asked by chupa_minor 1 in Immigration

2006-08-19 08:56:50 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Dear Nephew, First of all let me tell you I hope you are ok and you stay safe. But you must beware of the truth. And the truth? The Insurgents are going to win. That's right. WIN!! Why? Because they have a real purpose and they are willing to die for this purpose "AND" most of all they do it "FREE". That's correct. They fight for free. If you Marines were told "You will not get a paycheck from this day forward" you silly Marines would quit and go home. But not the insurgents. They never get a paycheck and yet they fight you day in and day out. So the Insurgents will win and my Nephew will taste defeat. That's the hard truth. My nephew will taste the sting of bitter defeat. The Insurgents will taste sweet victory and will dance the dance of the winners. But don't worry nephew....Burger King is still hiring. ( Note: It's owned by an Arab ) enjoy the Proud Marines. Later. Your uncle Erudite.

2006-08-19 08:55:35 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

This seems like the newest illegal immigration arguement; the arguement supporting illegal immigration seems to go further away from the core issues of economic impact, security problems, cultural issues, etc. and extends further out to "periphery" issues like most illegal immigrants are hard workers or what would you do? Should Americans be held liable for children of illegals? Either way, Americans are now immoral for either breaking up families if children are allowed to stay(and then wouldn't Americans have to pay for the children with more taxes?), or, immoral for deporting children along with their families and sending them to a culture "foreign" to them. Did illegal immigrants put these children in jeopardy by having them here to begin with? Do illegal immigrants bear no responsibility for the consequences of bringing children illegal to the US- either being deported with their families or being allowed to remain without family members who came illegal as wards of America?

2006-08-19 08:55:10 · 17 answers · asked by porthuronbilliam 4 in Immigration

http://rds.yahoo.com/S=53720272/K=immigrant+prostitution/v=2/SID=e/l=NSR/R=6/;_ylt=A9htfMLFaudE1O8A.gXQtDMD;_ylu=X3oDMTBjcDR2NTN2BHBvcwM2BHNlYwNzcg--/SIG=128chlrip/EXP=1156103237/*-http%3A//www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51360
Is this how they "make a better life" for themselves and their families, by destroying others lives, even their own peoples?

2006-08-19 08:54:06 · 13 answers · asked by Renegade. 3 in Immigration

2006-08-19 08:53:10 · 15 answers · asked by W E J 4 in Politics

Seems a bit racist if we don't.

2006-08-19 08:51:42 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

who knows the truth? is it you Heidi?

Which of the above does not fit?

2006-08-19 08:49:37 · 17 answers · asked by W E J 4 in Politics

2006-08-19 08:49:18 · 2 answers · asked by Dan 1 in Politics

When Hez violates the cease fire by failing to disarm, failing to return the abducted Israeli soldiers, and by restocking their missile supply, none of these events makes the news...because they're hard to get compelling video footage of. Thus, without an Israeli response, Hez can quietly restock and violate the cease fire all at once with an all out attack on Israel.

On the other hand, when Israel ENFORCES the UN Resolution prohibiting arms shipments to Hezbollah, these events always make the news...because Israel's actions are filmable and thus newsworthy....and so it looks to the public that Israel is the one to violate it.

Is Israel crazy to have gotten put into such a situation?

2006-08-19 08:49:16 · 7 answers · asked by Brand X 6 in Politics

cant distinguish their racism agains Mexicans if they are children, women and maybe even their own mothers? Vigilantes carry handguns in the border to shoot to kill these children. They torture them and rape them once they aprehend them. Ofcourse you ar egoing to see everyone awnsering yes. THEY ARE RACIST!!!!!!!!!!

AMNESTY TO ALL ILLEGALS

STOP HR 4437!!

2006-08-19 08:46:00 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

2006-08-19 08:44:54 · 15 answers · asked by getnabargain 2 in Immigration