Politics & Government - 6 August 2006

PASS AWAY

2006-08-06 20:40:18 · 5 answers · asked by DaShun 1 in Immigration

They probably just told you I'm a liberal, godless, treacherous, terrorist lovin commie..............right...........They are wrong again!

2006-08-06 20:40:06 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

I have Masters in education so I don't kmnow if that's going to do anything unless I take up school law.

But I want to know How much/years school I'd have to atttend to become a lawyer. I hope I don't have to start from scratch.;

2006-08-06 20:39:24 · 6 answers · asked by rache001 3 in Law & Ethics

2006-08-06 20:39:15 · 6 answers · asked by Coffee-Infused Insomniac 2 in Military

Hezbollah rockets are launched into populated regions of Israel maiming innocent civilians, yet if an arab child is killed, by the Israelis, thay are held accountable, is this madness or am I missing something? When will they ever stop killing each other? Sadly we are watching baseball while the world has gone mad.

2006-08-06 20:38:44 · 6 answers · asked by bobbyny27 3 in Military

SORRY GOD PLEASE FORGIVE ME

2006-08-06 20:38:38 · 7 answers · asked by DaShun 1 in Immigration

2006-08-06 20:38:32 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

funniest and most resonable answer 10 pnts

2006-08-06 20:38:05 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2006-08-06 20:37:33 · 0 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

An apartment manager asked me to pay $15 application fee and $20 for credit score check fee for wanting to lease the apartment. I paid. I was later told that all of the apartment units are full. Can I legally demand a refund of the fees. Sound like fraud to me.

Another example. I want to sell a very nice house for cheap, $50,000. But I charge people $10 for an "application fee." I quote on the application "while supply last." I don't have a house in the first place. Can I keep the $10 because I "processed" their applications.

Also, assume that I have a house and i really didn't want to sell the house. I just want the 10 dollars.

This also happened to me when try to get a dorm room at a university (no credit check though just $20 application). over 100 students was told that the dorm was full. There was a waiting list. by the time I was offer a room, half of the school year was over and I already had an apartment. This happen year after year.

2006-08-06 20:34:22 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

2006-08-06 20:31:37 · 5 answers · asked by klunk 3 in Military

sqwirlsgirl please Stop this nonsense. go home. we don't like people like you. go to a doctor to be Normal, you get this? go to a doctor to be normal. start seeing a psychiatrist today,So maybe he'll fix you up then. bloody marvellous.
I guess we're all looking for attention sqwirlsgirl do you really think I don't know how to get it, without you sqwirlsgirl I could dye my hair green and pink for a start! I don't represent anyone but my SELF. It sounds like I represented something to you, or you wouldn't be so violent towards me. (Your mom perhaps?) Yes sqwirlsgirl, mind games comes in mysterious ways it's wonders to perform, including verbal. But you'd know that kind of mind game, wouldn't you? Of course you would.Yes sqwirlsgirl , the one thing Zoe did was to affect PEOPLES' MINDS. Maybe you need another fix?
Couldn't resist adding a few "islands of truth" of my own, in answer to sqwirlsgirl howl of hate (pain.) Anyway.sqwirlsgirl has pictures she wants you to live up to. But that's the same as living up to your parents' expectations, or to society's expectations, or to so-called yahoo like sqwirlsgirl critics who are just lil sqwirlsgirls with a typewriter in a little room, smoking and drinking beer and having their dreams and nightmares, too, but somehow pretending that they're living in a different, separate world.sqwirlsgirl"I've never claimed divinity. I've never claimed purity of soul. I've never claimed to have the answer to life. I only answer questions as honestly as I can, but only as honestly as I can - no more, no less. I cannot live up to other people's expectations of me because they're illusionary. "Sometimes you wonder, I mean really wonder. I know we make our own reality and we always have a choice, but how much is preordained? Is there always a fork in the road and are there two preordained paths that are equally preordained? There could be hundreds of paths where one could go this way or that way - there's a choice and it's very strange sometimes.sqwirlsgirl What is real? What is the illusion your living or not living?' As the Hindus or Buddhists say, it's an illusion, meaning all matter is floating atoms, right? It's Rashomon. We all see it, but the agreed-upon illusion is what we live in. And the hardest thing is facing yourself. It's easier to shout what a rotten horrbile nasty place the world is casue it didn't give sqwirlsgirl everything she cried for than it is to look at at herself and try to find out what's real inside her and what isn't, when she'spulling the wool over her own eyes. That's the hardest one.. "Anyway, However much you hurt me darling; I'll always love you!

2006-08-06 20:31:15 · 9 answers · asked by Zoe 4 in Immigration

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGEb40o17yE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOVWBQKUpsU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtV1uxYnu0w

2006-08-06 20:27:59 · 9 answers · asked by bruserdog 2 in Civic Participation

please answer this seriously~ i need to know

2006-08-06 20:27:08 · 19 answers · asked by Jerome 2 in Law & Ethics

7yrs ago my brother's wife accused him of attempted murder yet he was being threatened by her meth head airean brotherhood boyfriends and fled the country for his safety before knowing he was being charged with attempted murder. Now how do we know if the charges were dropped and how can he come back to the US? We're thinking the charges are dropped because I've checked that counties websites for wanted suspects & he isn't listed. My bet is the police figured out the drama was on the part of the meth heads in the foothills who threaten and scare the locals.

2006-08-06 20:26:04 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

2006-08-06 20:25:50 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

5 million of our older Americans have not signed up yet for their Medicare, Part D, drug plan--they are old and confused.
We are not going to grant them an extension.

However, 12 million illegal aliens are in our country and we are going to allow them to stay, protest, procreate, receive support monies, attend schools, avoid paying income taxes, have our teachers take 300 hours of ESOL (English as a second language) training at our expense, etc.

WE MUST REALLY DISLIKE OUR OLD PEOPLE! OR, WE MUST REALLY LOVE TACOS!

2006-08-06 20:25:49 · 10 answers · asked by pappy 6 in Immigration

2006-08-06 20:24:54 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration

What would world look like if Grace Slick had put LSD in Nixon's tea?

2006-08-06 20:14:02 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

I can't quite figure out what I did wrong,perhaps nothing & all is worthless thieves covering their theft.I have been being tourtred in Kalamazoo,MI w/personal info in psycologically abusive ways since I can remember.Was it the comm major instead of Psyc. for the pre-law cirric. or was it the Highschool classmate who hates me that went into psyc. in college.Is it the nature of A_ _ H_ _ _ _ in a college town who need info & prey upon the made vulnerable or was it the way I was raised & protestant competition.Perhaps it was all the threats I recieved allong the way or maybe I left my hometown & went someplace else...What ever it was(is)it is being inflicted,it's outcome predictable.I call it due to the disableing pain(catastrophic)no less than tourtre.I will not(probably)read your abusive answers.I have no need to be abused&never have.You have helped w/less than nothing.I have been behav.modified to stop,less than a dog would be treated when trained,nothing new in Kalamazoo,MI...woof...

2006-08-06 20:12:50 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law Enforcement & Police

his public defender is saying that he most likely get 9-16 months and he has already served 6 and has yet to be arraigned. he has no prior record and the robbery was unarmed. he supposedly got away with 7 grand. i was just wondering how realistic is it for him to get 9-16 months considering this crime? it seems like too much of a lenient sentence for a crime like this. please answer if u have knowledge of this or your opinions are welcome..

2006-08-06 20:11:25 · 6 answers · asked by radley1009 1 in Law Enforcement & Police

2006-08-06 20:11:16 · 6 answers · asked by hallo hallo 1 in Law Enforcement & Police

2006-08-06 20:10:44 · 15 answers · asked by anil m 6 in Politics

Any government back then up to now that isn't running the USA "of the people,by the people AND, for the people", where the government is hiding things from the people, where the government is corrupt, must or should be replaced by another, "of, by, and for the people". If this is true, why hasn't this been done back in the middle to late 1960s after JFK was killed? Does anyone notice this in that great document?

2006-08-06 20:10:37 · 15 answers · asked by ZORRO 3 in Government

2006-08-06 20:09:12 · 6 answers · asked by mrs wini 1 in Politics

2006-08-06 20:07:57 · 9 answers · asked by zclifton2 6 in Military

When a person is in court they are asked to swear on the bible. This is understandable for christians, but (as a nihilist) is this not against my rights as an american? Does no one believe in the separation of church and state?

2006-08-06 20:07:31 · 10 answers · asked by skip_2015 2 in Law & Ethics

1. THE COVER UP

Someone had foreknowledge of the attacks. In the weeks leading up to 9/11 someone made a series of investments that would have paid off in huge profits because of the attacks. This is well documented and undisputed. This person specifically invested in the two airliners used in the attacks, anticipating windfall profits from any drop in the stock prices of these companies. This is solid evidence that at least one person in the United States had detailed information that something bad was going to happen to the specific airlines that were to be used in the attack.

We have been told that the person who made these investments never claimed the profits. We are expected to believe that this explains why his or her identity is unavailable. This is absolutely untrue. This is not an instance in which someone was waiting to pick up a package at an airport locker. This is a case of a financial institution processing an investment transaction for an individual. This CAN NOT BE PERFORMED ANONYMOUSLY! The identity of this person who had foreknowledge of the attack is know and this person’s identity is being protected by our government and this is a fact! Period, end of story.

WHO MADE THE INVESTMENT? Identify this person and you have someone who very probably had detailed foreknowledge of the events. The fact that the profits were never collected is even more suspicious and incriminating. The fact that the identity of this person remains unknown is even more suspicious. The only possible conclusion is that this person is known to the government and that his or her identity is being protected.

There has been a clear and concerted cover up regarding the person who tried to profit from events he or she knew were coming. The people who could easily clear this up, but who chose to close any further investigation into the matter are not underlings. They are officials who answer directly to the President of the United States. Check.

2. BUILDING 7

On September 11th, Towers One and Two collapsed after suffering direct hits by airliners. Building 7 was neither hit by an airliner nor damaged severely by flying debris, but at 5:20 p.m. it collapsed in the exact same accordion style of the other two towers. The official explanation by FEMA investigators claimed that WTC 7 fell as a result of burning for 7 hours.

Several weeks after the events of 9/11, Larry Silverstein, the new owner of the WTC was interviewed on TV. At this time he openly acknowledged the decision to pull Building 7. This was a public statement in which the owner of the WTC agreed to the destruction of the building.

This decision was never explained and was never questioned by the Kean Commission. The conflicting report of the FEMA investigators was also never explained. Pulling a building requires weeks, if not months of preparation. Explosives have to be carefully and strategically placed and wired. How was it possible to pull a building without first preparing for its demolition?

Larry Silverstein invested $386 million in WTC 7. On 9/11, by his own admission, Larry Silverstein ordered the demolition of his building. In February of 2002, his company won a settlement of $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers. Do the math. No one investigated. This is a confession to the demolition of Building 7. Let me repeat that, THIS IS A CONFESSION! Checkmate.

Until these questions are answered there is no need to establish more doubt. What we have here is solid undisputed evidence that we were never told the truth. We have solid evidence that the official investigation stopped short of delving into questions that could have supplied answers. We have solid proof that something is very, very wrong.

There is a mountain of unanswered questions concerning the events surrounding the 9/11 attacks. Anyone willing to listen or look at the inconsistencies would have to draw an obvious conclusion: the official explanation of the events of 9/11 is nothing more than a desperate attempt to distract the American people from investigating the truth. There can be no denying that there are a number of strange and puzzling occurrences that have never been, and seemingly cannot be explained.

Perhaps the abundance of startling and damning information is too incredible to be accepted easily by the millions of Americans who have bought into the corporate media's version of the events. So many people in this country can not deal with, or accept any real challenge to the official explanation that allows for no foreknowledge or cover up by their government. Even if most Americans were to be presented with clearly corroborated facts or cold evidence, they would probably refuse to even consider the involvement of their elected leaders in a tragedy of such huge proportions.

The official story, however, collapses after an examination of the two questions just raised. Very simply put, case closed. We do not need to pull an OJ here and bury the obvious under more evidence than the jury can handle. Show the Bronco chase and the blood evidence, and rest the prosecution. Otherwise we risk badly confusing a jury of the uninformed.

It is vital that the evidence based community encourage the American public to question the events for themselves. Two questions of this magnitude are enough to raise reasonable doubt. Two such questions that have gone uninvestigated and unexplained are enough to arouse curiosity,

We’re in a very dangerous game, here, and all of us are players. Much of what happened on September 11th remains at best unclear, and at worst terribly suspicious. The reality that the President of the United States spent more than 18 months resisting an official investigation into the most devastating tragedy in our history is in itself an outrage. But the reality that there is no official body still seeking answers to vital questions is an even greater outrage.

And if that remains the case, we all will have been checkmated, en masse.

Editor's NOTE: People might comment on this article by calling it a conspiracy theory. This is their usual way of dismissing the facts. I ask you, where exactly is there “theory” on this page? What elements of this article are in dispute? This is not a theory, this article poses questions that have not been answered and the people who call the results of the independent 9/11 research community “conspiracy theories” have yet to qualify their assertion. You can not simply call something a “theory” just because you have not looked closely enough to see the facts that have been presented. If you call this a theory you are in denial. Very simply put, you can not debate this issue. Many people will dismiss this, as they do all evidence that goes against what they want to believe, yet when asked what their criteria is for discerning between theory and fact, they will not have a logical answer. This is not theory and neither are the facts that have been brought to light by the many people involved in the legitimate independent 9/11 research community.

Watch Loose Change Second Edition On Line Free - Click Here! - This is a MUST watch video for anybody who wants to know more about the events of 9/11 than you have heard on your TV sets!
An URGENT Message from the Editor!
9/11 Truth Calling Oprah! - I submit to my fellow 9/11 truth seekers and truth bearers that our effort to alert the public will be victorious if Oprah Winfrey gets on board.
TvNewsLIES Challenges Believers of the Official Version of 9/11: - Where the Hell is YOUR proof?
They Are Not “Conspiracy Theories” - They Are, in Fact, “Discoveries”
9/11-PNAC, 9/11-PNAC - SHOULD BE THE #1 TOPIC OF DISCUSSION
A WAKE-UP CALL THE ALTERNATIVE AND LIBERAL MEDIA:
TO STOP IGNORING 9/11 AND THE PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY
WHY AMERICANS REFUSE TO BELIEVE THE 9/11 EVIDENCE!!! - The attacks of 9/11 were so unthinkable that most Americans would refuse to believe the complicity of their own government, even if presented with a mountain of evidence. - Very simply, it is possible to escape blame if you do something that nobody in the world believes you could do.
DAVID RAY GRIFFIN: ALMOST PERFECT ABOUT 9/11!
Before you call this a “Conspiracy Theory” read this! Learn the difference between theory and fact!
Close-Up of WTC-7 Collapse Footage Shows Unmistakable Demolition Charges
Professional Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 - On-line videos and in depth analysis.
9/11 Video Selection
How Building Implosions Work

2006-08-06 20:07:09 · 7 answers · asked by tough as hell 3 in Government

OK I agree to the fact that they are targeting innocent lives in Israel with missles but what else can they do to defend themselves? I mean didnt the USA nuke Japan and kill all the live in Hiroshima and Nakasaki? wouldnt that make them a terrorist country on that premise?

2006-08-06 20:06:50 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Before you read this article, conduct this test. Try to purchase some stock, or some futures, a mutual fund or some put options, without providing your identity. Go ahead and try it! See if you get anywhere. Find out what happens when you tell the investment firm that you want to make a huge investment anonymously. It can’t be done.

Then ask yourself this question: How could someone have placed anonymous put options on American Airlines and United Airlines just prior to the attacks of 9/11? Then ask yourself why no one has investigated this suspicious deal. Ask yourself why there has been no attempt by the US government to identify the person who anticipated huge profits from a disaster that was yet to occur. Is it because the trail possibly leads to the CIA?

Then wonder about the collapse of Building 7 on the day of the attacks. Ask yourself why the owner of the building allowed the building to be pulled down (intentionally demolished) hours after the Twin Towers fell. Pulling down a building takes weeks of planning and preparation so that explosives can be safely positioned and wired. Not so in this case. Wonder why.

If you have any doubts at all about the official 9/11 story, then the answers to these questions are all the proof you need that something is very, very wrong!

Independent 9/11 researchers have worked nonstop since the events to examine the events of 9/11 and they have uncovered enough information to seriously challenge the official versions of what happened on that fateful day. But maybe, just maybe, the very fact that massive amounts of information are available is a problem in itself. There may be far too much evidence for most Americans to face.

The challenges to the official stories may be too devastating to be processed by the average American who has spent a lifetime believing in the system. Many people can deal with the minor violations that are part of the political scene, but cannot possibly fathom a government that might be complicit in an attack on its own people. They are not unlike the parents who eventually come to terms with a child’s shoplifting spree. The same parents would do anything to deny far more serious accusations. Imagine the response of parents whose son turns out to be a Timothy McVeigh.

Some things are so disturbing that they are almost impossible to believe. That is why, in the 9/11 enigma, less is more. There is a real danger of frightening everyone off by offering too much information. Therefore, if we think of the problem as a chess game, two strategic moves can lead to checkmate.

There are two pieces of the 9/11 puzzle that on their own expose the lies of the administration.

Two questions must be raised so that even the most diehard Bush supporters realize they have been deceived. These are issues that no one can debate or dismiss. These are not conspiracy theories. They are fact-based questions that can lead to exposing the deceptions in the official reports. The apologists have no way to explain these away or justify them. Basically, they offer clear evidence that the official explanations of 9/11 are meaningless

2006-08-06 20:06:00 · 12 answers · asked by tough as hell 3 in Government