9/11 reality check part 2?

Question

1. THE COVER UP

Someone had foreknowledge of the attacks. In the weeks leading up to 9/11 someone made a series of investments that would have paid off in huge profits because of the attacks. This is well documented and undisputed. This person specifically invested in the two airliners used in the attacks, anticipating windfall profits from any drop in the stock prices of these companies. This is solid evidence that at least one person in the United States had detailed information that something bad was going to happen to the specific airlines that were to be used in the attack.

We have been told that the person who made these investments never claimed the profits. We are expected to believe that this explains why his or her identity is unavailable. This is absolutely untrue. This is not an instance in which someone was waiting to pick up a package at an airport locker. This is a case of a financial institution processing an investment transaction for an individual. This CAN NOT BE PERFORMED ANONYMOUSLY! The identity of this person who had foreknowledge of the attack is know and this person’s identity is being protected by our government and this is a fact! Period, end of story.

WHO MADE THE INVESTMENT? Identify this person and you have someone who very probably had detailed foreknowledge of the events. The fact that the profits were never collected is even more suspicious and incriminating. The fact that the identity of this person remains unknown is even more suspicious. The only possible conclusion is that this person is known to the government and that his or her identity is being protected.

There has been a clear and concerted cover up regarding the person who tried to profit from events he or she knew were coming. The people who could easily clear this up, but who chose to close any further investigation into the matter are not underlings. They are officials who answer directly to the President of the United States. Check.

2. BUILDING 7

On September 11th, Towers One and Two collapsed after suffering direct hits by airliners. Building 7 was neither hit by an airliner nor damaged severely by flying debris, but at 5:20 p.m. it collapsed in the exact same accordion style of the other two towers. The official explanation by FEMA investigators claimed that WTC 7 fell as a result of burning for 7 hours.

Several weeks after the events of 9/11, Larry Silverstein, the new owner of the WTC was interviewed on TV. At this time he openly acknowledged the decision to pull Building 7. This was a public statement in which the owner of the WTC agreed to the destruction of the building.

This decision was never explained and was never questioned by the Kean Commission. The conflicting report of the FEMA investigators was also never explained. Pulling a building requires weeks, if not months of preparation. Explosives have to be carefully and strategically placed and wired. How was it possible to pull a building without first preparing for its demolition?

Larry Silverstein invested $386 million in WTC 7. On 9/11, by his own admission, Larry Silverstein ordered the demolition of his building. In February of 2002, his company won a settlement of $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers. Do the math. No one investigated. This is a confession to the demolition of Building 7. Let me repeat that, THIS IS A CONFESSION! Checkmate.

Until these questions are answered there is no need to establish more doubt. What we have here is solid undisputed evidence that we were never told the truth. We have solid evidence that the official investigation stopped short of delving into questions that could have supplied answers. We have solid proof that something is very, very wrong.

There is a mountain of unanswered questions concerning the events surrounding the 9/11 attacks. Anyone willing to listen or look at the inconsistencies would have to draw an obvious conclusion: the official explanation of the events of 9/11 is nothing more than a desperate attempt to distract the American people from investigating the truth. There can be no denying that there are a number of strange and puzzling occurrences that have never been, and seemingly cannot be explained.

Perhaps the abundance of startling and damning information is too incredible to be accepted easily by the millions of Americans who have bought into the corporate media's version of the events. So many people in this country can not deal with, or accept any real challenge to the official explanation that allows for no foreknowledge or cover up by their government. Even if most Americans were to be presented with clearly corroborated facts or cold evidence, they would probably refuse to even consider the involvement of their elected leaders in a tragedy of such huge proportions.

The official story, however, collapses after an examination of the two questions just raised. Very simply put, case closed. We do not need to pull an OJ here and bury the obvious under more evidence than the jury can handle. Show the Bronco chase and the blood evidence, and rest the prosecution. Otherwise we risk badly confusing a jury of the uninformed.

It is vital that the evidence based community encourage the American public to question the events for themselves. Two questions of this magnitude are enough to raise reasonable doubt. Two such questions that have gone uninvestigated and unexplained are enough to arouse curiosity,

We’re in a very dangerous game, here, and all of us are players. Much of what happened on September 11th remains at best unclear, and at worst terribly suspicious. The reality that the President of the United States spent more than 18 months resisting an official investigation into the most devastating tragedy in our history is in itself an outrage. But the reality that there is no official body still seeking answers to vital questions is an even greater outrage.

And if that remains the case, we all will have been checkmated, en masse.

Editor's NOTE: People might comment on this article by calling it a conspiracy theory. This is their usual way of dismissing the facts. I ask you, where exactly is there “theory” on this page? What elements of this article are in dispute? This is not a theory, this article poses questions that have not been answered and the people who call the results of the independent 9/11 research community “conspiracy theories” have yet to qualify their assertion. You can not simply call something a “theory” just because you have not looked closely enough to see the facts that have been presented. If you call this a theory you are in denial. Very simply put, you can not debate this issue. Many people will dismiss this, as they do all evidence that goes against what they want to believe, yet when asked what their criteria is for discerning between theory and fact, they will not have a logical answer. This is not theory and neither are the facts that have been brought to light by the many people involved in the legitimate independent 9/11 research community.

Watch Loose Change Second Edition On Line Free - Click Here! - This is a MUST watch video for anybody who wants to know more about the events of 9/11 than you have heard on your TV sets!
An URGENT Message from the Editor!
9/11 Truth Calling Oprah! - I submit to my fellow 9/11 truth seekers and truth bearers that our effort to alert the public will be victorious if Oprah Winfrey gets on board.
TvNewsLIES Challenges Believers of the Official Version of 9/11: - Where the Hell is YOUR proof?
They Are Not “Conspiracy Theories” - They Are, in Fact, “Discoveries”
9/11-PNAC, 9/11-PNAC - SHOULD BE THE #1 TOPIC OF DISCUSSION
A WAKE-UP CALL THE ALTERNATIVE AND LIBERAL MEDIA:
TO STOP IGNORING 9/11 AND THE PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY
WHY AMERICANS REFUSE TO BELIEVE THE 9/11 EVIDENCE!!! - The attacks of 9/11 were so unthinkable that most Americans would refuse to believe the complicity of their own government, even if presented with a mountain of evidence. - Very simply, it is possible to escape blame if you do something that nobody in the world believes you could do.
DAVID RAY GRIFFIN: ALMOST PERFECT ABOUT 9/11!
Before you call this a “Conspiracy Theory” read this! Learn the difference between theory and fact!
Close-Up of WTC-7 Collapse Footage Shows Unmistakable Demolition Charges
Professional Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 - On-line videos and in depth analysis.
9/11 Video Selection
How Building Implosions Work

well you dont read so well do you?

bc............why dont you wont answers dont all those deaths mean anything to you....the Goverment knows who bought those put orders.why cwont they release the names? why?

bc............why dont you wont answers dont all those deaths mean anything to you....the Goverment knows who bought those put orders.why want they release the names? why?

ZORRO
this is the biggest part of our "yard"

Answer 1

again way too long, good day

Answer 2

So when are Bill and Hillary going to picked up for this crime? Does this have to do with travelgate? Come on. If this is the case, why is everyone trying this only in the court of public opinion? If the facts are so blatant, the government could not cover this up. You forget that we have checks and balances in our government. You assume that everyone in the government and stock exchange are Republicans. If we use your logic, we could also assume that it was the Democrats who did this to hurt the Republicans. They are in the government also, so why wouldn't they be able to cover this up? You give the White House way too much power, when the power of the house or the senate would be able to destroy the administration if they wanted to. Do you think the GOP would just allow this administration sink their ship if this really happened? No, they would align with the DNC to take the President down so they wouldn't lose power. You also assume that our elected official are complete morons that have no way of getting information except from the White House. Do you have the footage of how bad building 7 was damaged when the towers fell? Could an investigation be performed in 7 hours before B7 fell? NO! By the way, writers main goal is to sell books, so what makes a better story than the government be responsible for this. Your conspiracy theories don't fly too well. All your points can be argued the other way if you do enough. research.

Answer 3

A prudent Mind believe only what it wants to believe. A normal eye see only that it want sto see. But only an intelligent mind discovers, analyses, debates, studies and put forth the fact and open it for further debate and discussion, Only a sharp tye like an elephant has look not merely see, available vision and get into even darker areas. You have both intelligent brain and sharp eyes. If you succeed to prove that the 9/11 was not the act of either Saddam or Laden or for that matter the islam is not at all involved in 9/11, Bush will be permitted to drink his own*******, and many of the controversies the world is facing today, will be resolved. Better effort of research my dear friend.

Answer 4

Exactly WHERE is your proof?
All I read was you rambling on and on and on andon andon.
It kinda all blurred after awhile.
We will never truly know what happened that day other than it was a tragedy beyond our imaginations and my heart still breaks to remember watching those towers fall.
I will not lay it all at President Bush's feet.Clinton knew all about it long before he left office,and that,too has been backed up with proof when they published the memo's "for his eyes only".
He was a corrupt and worthless as they get!
It is just convenient to blame Bush since he was in office when it happened.I won't say he didn't know something but you CANNOT lay it all at his door.

Answer 5

I have heard these things......Why isn't there something being done about this?
The truth will most likely ever be known.

Answer 6

9/11 that is old news. Dwelling on the past never solves the present problems. We should spend more time on cleaning up our own back yard.

Answer 7

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ApKndVpylk8HDllcGlFu8uPsy6IX?qid=20060805150547AAx09Da