Current Events - December 2007

I don't mind about that as I don't care enough about yahoo answers anyway-but what do you all think?
I think it's more like a chat room by the hour!

2007-12-04 09:15:40 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

heello, iss tthhatt thhee sshhoop iii boouugghht thhee vviibbrrattorr ffrroomm. yes. ccaann yyoouu tteell mmee hhooww ttoo ttuurrnn tthhee ffuucckkiinngg tthhiinngg ooffff.
My sister took the call today and the asker said she was told about their products on yahoo answers.

2007-12-04 08:48:52 · 13 answers · asked by x Queen Bee x 3

People have been quick to jump and accuse iran of trying to develop a bomb when they said they werent.

We were going to be duped into another Iraq cos of the heightened media speculation.

And now it has been shown and proven by the US security exactly what was contrary to what was said by some war mongers.

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30200-1295529,00.html

What is up with George Bush in wanting to have another war before he leaves office?

2007-12-04 08:44:22 · 8 answers · asked by Den 2

LINCOLN PARK, Mich. -- A 21-year-old Lincoln Park father was arraigned Monday on charges that he sexually assaulted and murdered his 8-day-old daughter.

During the hearing, Christopher Richardson vehemently denied that he committed the acts, repeating, "I didn't do this" to the judge and his family.

He asked the judge if he could "give blood or something to prove that I didn't do this, man."

Earlier Monday, Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy held a news conference to give details on what Richardson is accused of doing to his infant daughter, Neveah Richardson.

Richardson had been charged with domestic violence in the beating of his wife. Added to that charge Monday afternoon was murder, sexual assault and criminal sexual conduct against his baby.

Neveah had died as a result of an anal intrusion that caused "massive internal bleeding and sepsis" (infected blood), Worthy said in the news conference.

At his arraignment, Richardson continuously denied this.

2007-12-04 08:18:39 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Opinions please!!!

2007-12-04 08:01:02 · 42 answers · asked by olivia 2

With Iraq? It wouldn't suprise me one bit.

2007-12-04 07:36:23 · 4 answers · asked by Scooter_loves_his_dad 7

2007-12-04 07:34:34 · 25 answers · asked by Maxi Robespierre 5

people like Mark S and Whitesapphire amongst others

2007-12-04 07:29:03 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

I've missed the newsreports and have read very briefly about any of it, but can someone explain to me how it is that the US has come to that conclusion precisely now? Is it from some particular reports? And how come they didn't know this earlier, after all it was four years ago that they stopped. And the US had kept on insisting otherwise until two days ago.

2007-12-04 07:28:30 · 4 answers · asked by news-n-more-news 2

2007-12-04 06:53:08 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why is it wrong to want to keep our way of life as it is. why is it racist to profess the religion of our country. Why are so many laws being created to silence any thoughts of a national identity. I am an English Protestant, I want Nativity plays, Christmas, Easter eggs, and the way of life my parents enjoyed.

2007-12-04 06:45:29 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

My question is regarding the recent news regarding the recent anger expressed by the people in Kabul over the gifts of soccer balls containing Allah written on them.

Whether the gift of soccer balls was given with the best of intentions or not, the fact that such a big time snafu would be committed, shows that there are still some pretty huge misunderstandings between the two cultures.

I thought that the US had Muslim advisors to prevent such incidents from occurring? Are American troops in need of more Muslim advisors, or is this even a problem that can be avoided in the future by simply increasing the number of Muslim advisors?

2007-12-04 06:41:30 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

Vice President Cheney was indicted by a federal Grand Jury for war crimes it is public record. Why is there not more of a stink being raised about it. I mean people it is your country too, don't you pay any attention to current events. Or do you just want to follow some hick president thant does not know how to pronounce the word nuclear.

2007-12-04 06:40:29 · 4 answers · asked by robert s 5

Everyone seems to assume he has or has not. So I put it to you: six weeks ago, President Bush said that World War III was a real possibility if Iran developed nuclear weapons.

This National Intelligence Estimate was published on December first. Did the White House have some knowledge of the report? If so, when? And if the White House was aware of these new facts, has the President misled or lied to the American people?

Thanks.

2007-12-04 06:23:39 · 9 answers · asked by blueevent47 5

I do, with parents like them anything could happen!

2007-12-04 06:14:42 · 17 answers · asked by McTerminator 1

They only care about the parents. I think It's well out of order! Don't you?

2007-12-04 06:00:28 · 6 answers · asked by McTerminator 1

want them) and those that actually USE them?

Surely military action by Yankees (and Brits) should only follow the USE of these weapons? Or else we are the aggressors and it is a preemptive, immoral war?

Are they going to make the same mistake with Iran as they did with Iraq

2007-12-04 05:53:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-04 05:24:50 · 9 answers · asked by baski 1

I cant believe that there are professions where people sit around and calculate stuff like this....

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071203/od_afp/swedenchristmaskyrgyzstansantaoffbeat_071203163428

Who pays them?

2007-12-04 05:10:24 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-04 04:42:12 · 7 answers · asked by 6th Finger 2

Has Bush's credibility wavered at all in your mind? With the recent report by the United States National Intelligence Estimate stating Iran is NOT an immediate threat
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7126117.stm) after Bush and his administration REPEATEDLY have said they are ("Mr. Bush said he had “told people that if you’re interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon.” http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/18/washington/18prexy.html)) and beating the drum for war, doesn't this make him seem a little loony? Is he oblivious to reason? How would you defend this blatant example of fearmongering and manipulation?

"Bush: US must remain vigilant on Iran"
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071204/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush

Are you even a little embarrassed? I'm sorry in advance for offending anyone, I'm just perplexed that anyone would continue to support this guy.

2007-12-04 04:11:11 · 10 answers · asked by contrarycrow 4

best ans. gets 10 points.

2007-12-04 03:03:14 · 6 answers · asked by Dr. Knowitall 6

Their advanced policies of open borders, retreat in the face of danger, granting citizen's rights to illegal aliens, negotiations with terrorist sponsor nations, the taking of property and wealth from those who have earned it for "the common good",
will have almost immediate and devastating effects on the economy and the citizens from which we may not be able to recover.
The tragedy of the movement of the poverty line northward over a 1000 miles will be insurmountable.

2007-12-04 02:51:16 · 5 answers · asked by W.C. FIelds 1

http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=89

2007-12-04 02:45:54 · 27 answers · asked by Andromeda 3

2007-12-04 02:31:58 · 4 answers · asked by kristeniskindaweird 2

Every single day I look at Yahoo Business reports. One day oil is up, the next day oil is down. Is it all just a bunch of hokie pokie speculation?

2007-12-04 01:35:54 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is an unscientific effort to get a "feel" for what the country is doing. I will undoubtedly vote in primaries and general elections. I also believe that the defeat of Islamic terrorism is our #1 issue. The economy is doing well, social security needs fixed and soon, healthcare needs to remain an issue for the open marketplace. Look at all the conflicts around the world and you will see Muslims involved. And YES, I believe we must fight them on their turf and prevent them from moving the battle to ours. Removing the troops brings the battle home.

2007-12-04 01:12:12 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7125521.stm

can't wait for the double standard people now

2007-12-04 00:09:08 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

And is it always accurate?

2007-12-04 00:02:07 · 18 answers · asked by Babe 2

If some consider calling a teddy bear Mohammed is worthy of the death penalty, whatever are they going to do when they find out?

2007-12-03 22:38:33 · 33 answers · asked by Essex Ron 5