Has President Bush lied about Iran?

Question

Everyone seems to assume he has or has not. So I put it to you: six weeks ago, President Bush said that World War III was a real possibility if Iran developed nuclear weapons.

This National Intelligence Estimate was published on December first. Did the White House have some knowledge of the report? If so, when? And if the White House was aware of these new facts, has the President misled or lied to the American people?

Thanks.

Answer 1

I think that now that there is an issue with Iran, the country will think he is just "crying wolf" now and won't support his investigation into Iran's nuclear program, because of his lies about Iraq and their WMD's that were never found.

Answer 2

The National Intelligence surprised us...!
At least we didn't expect from those US Intelligence services to issue that. Anyway, this is one of the important events which can affect the world diplomacy against Iran peaceful nuclear activities.
In the other side Bush lied to US people again. After "Al-Baradeyi" reports about Iran nuclear activities, this one was a real shock for US militant politicians.

Answer 3

between the considerable authors of the at the instant-released NIE on Iran sang a distinctive track to Congress below 5 months in the past. Thomas Fingar testified to the thoroughly opposite end on July eleventh, 2007 -- that Iran continued to pursue nuclear weapons. This has a tendency to confirm that the replace in posture got here very at the instant: "Iran and North Korea are the states of maximum situation to us. united states of america’ concerns approximately Iran are shared by using many countries, jointly with a lot of Iran’s buddies. Iran is persevering with to pursue uranium enrichment and has shown greater pastime in protracting negotiations and dealing to delay and cut back the effect of u.s. sanctions than in attaining a suitable diplomatic answer. We verify that Tehran is desperate to enhance nuclear weapons--regardless of its international responsibilities and international stress. that's a grave situation to the different countries interior the area whose risk-free practices may be threatened might desire to Iran obtain nuclear weapons. Fingar gave this testimony to the residing house Armed centers Committee. because of the fact the Deputy Director of examine for the CIA, this might actual be talked approximately as the definitive status for the intelligence community on the time. Fingar's assessment might have formed the inspiration for White residing house coverage." So if the considerable author of the checklist didnt comprehend 5 months in the past how did Bush comprehend "an prolonged time in the past"

Answer 4

No. He was briefed on the report on Nov. 28th.

And WWIII is still a possibility if Iran develops nuclear weapons. I'm not sure how you read into that report a flat assertion that Iran will not develop nuclear weapons.

Answer 5

Possibly Bush was lied to. I haven't a lot of time for politicians of any stripe, but to be fair, he has to rely on what he is told. If someone is feeding him biassed information how can he tell? Incidentaly, Israel has had the bomb for decades now, and after all Israel is only another grubby little Middle Eastern country, so why is it that nobody gets het up about Israel? What is so special about them that the US has to fight all their enemies and allow them to have nukes?

Answer 6

I don't know but since we didn't find any WMD's in Iraq does that mean President Clinton lied about them in 1998?

Answer 7

I think he has. he doesnt seem to know what he is doing.

Answer 8

is there anything he has not lied about.?

Answer 9

bla bla bla. whine whine whine.