Global Warming

Or are they smart enough not to believe everything people tell them.

2007-11-06 16:29:09 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

They say it can be done but it costs too much so I wonder if anyone knows how much its worth.

2007-11-06 14:11:24 · 7 answers · asked by jim m 5

I talked with my supervisor.. and he told me that they haven't resources $_$ to pay a container for the carton. The transportation also costs... then i decided do nothing abot this, but i'm still worried... can somebody tell me what ican do?
Where i have to go or who i have to reach... or call?
I'm from Arizona.

2007-11-06 13:51:53 · 3 answers · asked by Roger 2

I just wanna know if global warming is improving and the rate of its improvement and or its disimprovement please, and thank you!

2007-11-06 12:12:16 · 16 answers · asked by albertpalacios91 1

Can't these greenies see that they are being duped?
Global Warming is just the latest vehicle to grow government, raise taxes, roll back lifestyles, and take away personal freedom.
Why are greenies so easily duped? Even if global warming is caused by man, how is government or the U.N. getting involved going to fix it and not make it worse. Think about the war of poverty, we have thrown trillions of dollars at it, and according to the Democratic platform, it's worse than ever. So throwing money at the problem isn't fixing it.

2007-11-06 11:21:51 · 12 answers · asked by stratmagic 2

2007-11-06 10:41:52 · 3 answers · asked by tcrusier31 1

2007-11-06 08:10:59 · 17 answers · asked by Saires 4

Though Americans make up just 4 percent of the world's population, we produce 25 percent of the carbon dioxide pollution from fossil-fuel burning -- by far the largest share of any country. In fact, the United States emits more carbon dioxide than China, India and Japan, combined. Clearly America ought to take a leadership role in solving the problem. And as the world's top developer of new technologies, we are well positioned to do so -- we already have the know-how.

2007-11-06 07:28:41 · 17 answers · asked by The Mentor 4

2007-11-06 07:23:58 · 15 answers · asked by Kalidas 2

2007-11-06 07:06:31 · 12 answers · asked by thegubmint 7

If this was ture the number of scientist who believe in global warming could be inflated.

2007-11-06 06:32:13 · 7 answers · asked by Rocketman 6

I know that some out there who think the midwest is simply flyover country and Global Warming has been caused by the evil Republicans. But, can someone explain why having a shorter and warmer winter is such a bad thing? I have lived through too many cold and ugly winters and am puzzled why some think global warming is such a bad thing? Also can it be proven conclusively that Global warming even is happening? What will be the next great cause be? Global Cooling? Sorry, it's called "Winter". To all the Lefty nutjobs out there, prove to me why Global warming in the midwestern United States is Bad!!!!!

2007-11-06 06:29:12 · 15 answers · asked by mntazzy 2

I think this article explains why they won a peace prize for their work on this environmental issue.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/nov/04/climatechange.scienceofclimatechange?gusrc=rss&feed=networkfront

"A total of 46 nations and 2.7 billion people are now at high risk of being overwhelmed by armed conflict and war because of climate change. A further 56 countries face political destabilisation, affecting another 1.2 billion individuals.

This stark warning will be outlined by the peace group International Alert in a report, A Climate of Conflict, this week. Much of Africa, Asia and South America will suffer outbreaks of war and social disruption as climate change erodes land, raises seas, melts glaciers and increases storms, it concludes. Even Europe is at risk.

'Climate change will compound the propensity for violent conflict, which in turn will leave communities poorer and less able to cope with the consequences of climate change'"

Any thoughts?

2007-11-06 06:06:36 · 8 answers · asked by Dana1981 7

2007-11-06 05:42:46 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-06 05:41:36 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-06 05:29:38 · 14 answers · asked by =] 5

The IPCC report represents the consensus of thousands of scientists, but to be an anthropogenic global warming doubter, you have to doubt this report's validity.

We often see AGW doubters invoke Lindzen or Christy or Tim Ball. Some new favorites are a Scafetta & West paper, and now Carl Wunsch.

This makes me wonder - what makes a person accept one scientist's conclusions while dismissing the conclusions of thousands of other scientists who are all in agreement? Does the principle 'two (or thousands of) heads are better than one' somehow not apply to science?

2007-11-06 04:59:30 · 9 answers · asked by Dana1981 7

Live in huge enormous houses and drive big fancy cars that pollute and consume more energy in two months than the average American does in a year. I just find it hard to fathom that someone like Al Gore who pushes these strong ideas about AGW, pollutes and uses up so much energy that really is not necessary.

2007-11-06 03:54:27 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-06 03:39:32 · 12 answers · asked by george w 1

1. true cost charges for removal of house hold rubbish.
2. international agreement on carbon tax credits.
3. recovery of stamp duty on homes which improve their enery efficiency.
please help as i am really stuck.

2007-11-06 03:25:50 · 3 answers · asked by louisa s 1

what kind of items do i need?

2007-11-06 03:05:23 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

The solar cycle is the eleven-year cycle of the solar activity of the sun, first determined in 1843 by astronomer Heinrich Schwabe. Solar variations in output have been measured from satellites. Climate scientists are trying to determine how much the variations effect the temperature of Earth's atmosphere.

What do you think, and please provide a link or two if you have them.

2007-11-06 02:27:20 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

I was gonna go with $.10 lbs.

2007-11-06 00:33:11 · 2 answers · asked by jack_scar_action_hero 3

I'm guessing that sometime late in 2010. Then we are going to hear more and more news about the end of the world, the Mayan Calendar, Nostradamus, and the Bible.

People will believe that there is substance to these stories just like they believe in the global warming stories.

Movies will be made showing us how the end of days will happen, books will be written, Discovery Channel, The History Channel, CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC will all be running specials about the end of the world.

Politicians will be witting laws, raising taxes, and the public will demand to be saved even if it means giving up their freedoms.

This scare will overtake headlines moving "global warming" to the back pages.

I just wonder if anyone will even care about "warming" after 2012.

What are your thoughts?

2007-11-06 00:21:15 · 24 answers · asked by Dr Jello 7

what have you noticed in climate and weather change in the past 15 years?

2007-11-06 00:15:03 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Even scientists who believe in global warming are not happy about the exaggerated claims. Al Gore's movie had many of them. I see the same claims being repeated in answers here.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4923504.stm
http://ocean.mit.edu/~cwunsch/papersonline/wunschaha2007.pdf

Hans von Storch and Carl Wunsch are trying to get scientists to be more responsible. What can you do to help cut the exaggeration?

2007-11-05 23:26:20 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

i have got intercollege debate compition tomorrow so i would be very grate ful if anyone could help mew with the topic

2007-11-05 22:13:14 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

....the average family compact car doing average annual mileage OR the average family (2 adults + 2 children) just breathing for a year? (We can leave digestive gases out of the equations!) I have seen a calculation showing that they produce about the same...2.5 tonnes. Is this right? (..and pretty scary when you look at the impact of global population growth, irrespective of what we do to reduce industrial emissions!) The carbon emissions of cars is easy because all new cars have it as part of their specifications...so many g/km and the 2.5 tonnes is about right. I get stuck in the bio-medical-mathematics for the breathing though! Thanks for you help.

2007-11-05 21:11:01 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I know that no one can say for sure where it will get hot or cold or dry up or whatever, but failing to plan is planning to fail. So assuming a warmer planet, where might be livable in 50 or 100 years?

For sure the coasts will flood. Someplace like Alaska could be good, but once all that perma-frost melts its going to be a mess. Plus they'll have black fly problems all year long.

How about someplace in the mountains? With a reliable water supply? What about food? What about electricity?

Some countries don't allow foreigners to buy real estate, so if that's an issue I happen to be American.

2007-11-05 20:33:32 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Global Warming is a load of bunk?

2007-11-05 18:02:23 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous