If this was ture the number of scientist who believe in global warming could be inflated.
2007-11-06 06:32:13 · 7 answers · asked by Rocketman 6 in Environment ➔ Global Warming
Yes. Scientist like Dr. William Gray no longer recieves funds for scientific research because he isn't a believer.
He currently uses his own money to investigate climate changes.
There is a lot of money in global warming. And the responsibility to distribute those funds is done by people who are die hard believers of so called "global warming".
What chance does someone who thinks science should be objective have in getting grant money?
2007-11-06 06:44:24 · answer #1 · answered by Dr Jello 7 · 7⤊ 2⤋
More were bullied into saying that global warming was not real.
Do you think large scientific organizations like the National Academy of Sciences or the American Association for the Advancement of Science, can be bullied?
EVERY major scientific organization says global warming is real and mostly caused by us.
Pretending that the vast majority of scientists is supporting global warming for reasons other than the mountain of data that says it's real, is ridiculous.
"The fact that the community overwhelmingly supports the consensus is evidenced by picking up any copy of Journal of Climate or similar, any scientific program at the meetings, or simply going to talk to scientists. I challenge you, if you think there is some un-reported division, show me the hundreds of abstracts that support your view - you won't be able to. You can argue whether the consensus is correct, or what it really implies, but you can't credibly argue it doesn't exist."
NASA's Gavin Schmidt
2007-11-06 07:18:29 · answer #2 · answered by Bob 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
not 'bullied' so much as losing funding or being denied work grants or publication.
considering the evidence that is surfacing now showing that man-made carbon dioxide-fueled Global Warming is unlikely to be real... I just can't wait to see the Class-Action suits against Gore for refunds for the Carbon Credits.
2007-11-06 08:19:57 · answer #3 · answered by Bryan~ Unapologetic Conservative 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, it's not true. Nobody has ever provided evidence to support such a claim.
If a scientist can't get published, it's because his paper didn't pass peer-review. If a paper doesn't pass peer-review, it's because the science is poor, not because the review panel disagrees with the politics. That's how peer-review works.
If a scientist can't get funding, then perhaps his proposed experiments do not merit funding.
2007-11-06 06:56:55 · answer #4 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Yes, they made them sit on a pellet stove until they gave in to global warming!!
2007-11-06 06:52:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I don't know about the bullying but a number did not agree with the UN's final report but couldn't get their names taken off the report.
2007-11-06 06:40:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
I don't know if it's true but it wouldn't surprise me!
2007-11-06 06:40:10 · answer #7 · answered by Gen•X•er (I love zombies!) 6 · 5⤊ 3⤋