English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They say it can be done but it costs too much so I wonder if anyone knows how much its worth.

2007-11-06 14:11:24 · 7 answers · asked by jim m 5 in Environment Global Warming

The excess CO2 that has been put there by human activity could be removed in order to restore the natural balance at a reasonable cost. It would be useful to know what value this might have.

2007-11-07 08:23:56 · update #1

7 answers

All the plant life would die and then all animals would follow. Doesn't sound like you thought this out too well.

Where did anyone get the idea that CO2 is bad? I sometimes wonder what kids are taught in school these days. Science must be low on the priority list.

2007-11-06 14:26:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous 7 · 1 3

i will agree nonetheless that "CO2 is in simple terms too small a fragment of the ambience to electrify something" isn't a useful assertion or perchance a canard as you place it. even nonetheless, the component of this question is a additionally a canard. utilising analogies in this sort is a canard. hint quantities of arsenic being deadly has no longer something to do with hint quantities of CO2 in the ambience. The assessment won't be able to be made. This argument is bunk. all of us be attentive to that hint quantities of CO2 in the ambience are area of the vital greenhouse effect. all of us be attentive to that increasing this quantity will reason some warming. What we don't is by utilising how lots. There are a great array of guesses in this. Skeptics have self assurance it is been over priced. modern-day information helps that.

2016-10-03 12:49:38 · answer #2 · answered by bhuwan 4 · 0 0

There would be a much higher value if we used that money to prevent more CO2 from being emitted in the first place. Nature would eventually take care of the extras in our atmosphere on its own.

2007-11-06 23:39:14 · answer #3 · answered by Ingela 3 · 0 1

If carbon dioxide were removed from the atmosphere you wouldnt have to worry about costs because you would be long gone!!! Did you ever have elementary science and biology in school? Plant life produces oxygen after it ingestsCO2 by photosynthesis., if I remember my facts form 70 years ago.

2007-11-06 15:18:56 · answer #4 · answered by googie 7 · 1 0

all you answerers have to remember that people that believe in all this global warming crap are people that don't have a clue. Ask them what made the earth warm up after the last ice age, and they look at you with a blank look on their face, or they try to change the subject.

2007-11-07 05:51:41 · answer #5 · answered by heada_bone 3 · 1 0

We don't have to do that.

All we need to do is stop adding so much excess CO2 ourselves. Much easier.

http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11638

"If the Earth came with an operating manual, the chapter on climate might begin with a caveat that the system has been adjusted at the factory for optimum comfort, so don't touch the dials."

2007-11-06 16:44:29 · answer #6 · answered by Bob 7 · 2 3

Damn right, heada!! They worship that loser Al Gore, who doesn't have a clue as to what's really going on in the world. How many of them know that he got his fortune from oil and coal?

2007-11-08 05:19:13 · answer #7 · answered by Richard T 1 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers