I can only find the full paper downloadable for $25, and I'm not willing to pay that, but here it is if anyone wants to read it:
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/117857349/ABSTRACT?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
Abstract: "We examine tropospheric temperature trends of 67 runs from 22 'Climate of the 20th Century' model simulations and try to reconcile them with the best available updated observations (in the tropics during the satellite era). Model results and observed temperature trends are in disagreement in most of the tropical troposphere, being separated by more than twice the uncertainty of the model mean. In layers near 5 km, the modelled trend is 100 to 300% higher than observed, and, above 8 km, modelled and observed trends have opposite signs. These conclusions contrast strongly with those of recent publications based on essentially the same data."
Do you think their argument has merit? Why?
No political rhetoric please - just scientific arguments.
2007-12-11
05:50:01
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Dana1981
7