Global Warming ..........?

Question

If you were to find out that you are being lied to about Global Warming being a serious, man made threat, would you get angry about it?

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=c9554887-802a-23ad-4303-68f67ebd151c

Answer 1

No, I already know that I am being lied to. Global warming is a cycle, and the morons who believe the media and think that we need to live in a high rise, or put a composting pile in our back yards to "save the planet" needs to shut their faces, stop preaching to people who are smart enough to know it's a cycle, and start using their brain themselves. There is no way our activity could possibly effect the planet's natural cycles. In fact, I recently found out that we would need to explode in excess of 100 million nuclear bombs to even start feeling the effects of a "nuclear winter". I think we will be fine, and no one is going to die as a result of global warming.

Answer 2

I already know the I am being lied to. I never believed it was man-made in the first place...
-especially when the same warming trend can be linked back 100+ years
-especially when I was around when they wanted to launch satellites prepared to warm the Earth because there was global cooling and they though it was the onset of an ice age
- especially because the agenda of the Kyoto supporters is so suspiciously Socialist

I'm not angry though. The Earth is warming and so it Mars. Soooo, what's really goin' on? Maybe the Sun has something to do with it, or do Martians drive SUV's?

Answer 3

The main problem with posting anything to refute the outcomes of the IPCC meteorologists, I mean climatologists, is that the alarmists will never listen to you or any evidence you provide. They tend to use the simple argument of "what's the use of debating you, you'll never accept this evidence", even though they are the same way. They have jumped on board with this "doom and gloom" argument and refuse to step down or admit they were on the wrong side. They just need to feel like they are important. Also, it's funny how these so-called climate and environmental scientists on these boards don't seem to have the rhetoric like the rest of the scientists who write papers and proposals. The only time you see them use the lingo is when they cut and paste their arguments.

The bottom line, the scientists should practice real science. This global warming situation has political agenda written all over it. Jobs and livelihoods are at stake, with the alarmist's side, because many are highly invested in it. If scientists go back to their old ways by sharing and debating the data (BETWEEN THEMSELVES WITHOUT ANY INFLUENCE OF AGENDA-DRIVEN POLITICIANS) then we can get to the bottom of the debate.

Let the scientists farily debate the subject.

Answer 4

In the nineteen fifties scientists told us high school students the earth was going into another ice age. Scientists in the nineteen seventies said the same thing and harped on it for years. Some of the scientists that are promoting this idea of global warming don’t seem to have a belief in God; more of an atheist attitude. It may be the atheist new religion without God. It could be that these people are looking for more control of people like in the book 1984 or movie V for vendetta. Some of these same scientists said that cranberries cause cancer. Go figure. It’s easier to believe in Edgar Casey’s (Cayce) tilting of the earth crap than global warming. By the way eggs will kill you. Oh sorry that was last week’s scientific claim. I wish those scientists would wait until the ice age has passed before we go into global warming.

Answer 5

in case you desire to acquire furnish funds for climate learn, do you think of which you will get a cheque in case you're saying," i want the furnish, as i think of that i'm able to coach that the figures that the present paradigm is predicated upon are incorrect" ? the great environmentalist, David Bellamy, has been silenced, and refused airtime. there remains no shown causative link between the quantity of Co2 interior the ambience, and a upward push in worldwide temperatures. The WWWF photos of the polar bears swimming have been taken interior the Arctic summer season; while the ice cap partly melts, as they could no longer arise to image interior the wintry climate. The ice replaced into too thick! The East-Anglian uni learn figures. "Oh! The figures do no longer adventure our expectancies. Oh properly. save quiet. by way of fact all of us comprehend that we are perfect." while the concept, and the religion is greater important than squarely dealing with the valid doubts of rather some non furnish-supported scientists, technology has been superceded via religious zealots. As Oliver Cromwell colourfully pronounced." I pray thee, interior the bowels of Christ, evaluate that thou mayest be incorrect."

Answer 6

Al Gore must be making big bucks. I have heard every time he speaks he gets at least $200,000.

According to the scientists of the world, every 50,000 years or so we have a cycle change. This is normal.

Global warming is a lie and so is Gore!

Answer 7

No I would not get mad, the 600 million year old record of climate history that we have clearly shows that at no time in Earth's history has climate ever responded to atmospheric CO2 levels, including the last 100 years. When you see something with your own eyes you tend to believe it.

.
.

Answer 8

SO the ANSWER to YOUR QUESTION IS THEY WANT a CARBON TAX to tax evil OIL Corporations DEM Senator DODD. that means trickle down to you $8.00 a gallon Gas Higher food prices TRUCKS deliver food run on FUEL,higher electric they will build NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS its a low carbon foot print . "This is the problem with all this environmental claptrap . . . it's a convenient excuse for politicians to just start taxing people. Some of these guilt-laden, middle-class liberals think it's somehow good: 'Oh, that's my contribution to the environment.' It's not. You're just being robbed--it's just highway [bleeping] robbery."
90% of France runs on Nuclear .SO the ANSWER to YOUR QUESTION IS THEY WANT a DODD. that means trickle down to you $8.00 a gallon Gas Higher food prices TRUCKS deliver food run on FUEL,higher electric they will build NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS its a low carbon foot print .Carbon Tax will go to build these also if you donate to Blue Sky thru power company the $ goes to build new nuclear plants they say its clean low carbon foot print,Be careful what we wish for

ANSWER: ask teachers What happen to the polar bears during the last 5 ICE AGES?.
Al Gore JET do you agree Al needs to drive a bicycle instead of a Jet his power bill is $3,000 a month for 1 of his houses

Step it UP We want a carbon Tax,Carbon tax on internet, it would increase gas $8.00 a gallon increase food and goods because of shipping cost .and a increase in electric price ,Its a problem lets fix it by Shut off all electric 6 days a week,only turn water on city for 1 hour a day, We have to SAVE the EARTH ,ride bikes outlaw driving except politicians, 1 gallon of gas a day , mandatory jail think live green ! EU Carbon Tax paid by the Workers,Bush Al Gore & Hillary Trust the UN carbon Tax


We are living in strange times. One exceptionally warm winter is enough--irrespective of the fact that in the course of the twentieth century the global temperature increased only by 0.6 percent--for the environmentalists and their followers to suggest radical measures to do something about the weather, and to do it right now.

Rational and freedom-loving people have to respond. The dictates of political correctness are strict and only one permitted truth, not for the first time in human history, is imposed on us. Everything else is denounced.

NewsAccording to the new data published by NASA, 1998 is no longer the hottest year ever. 1934 is.

Four of the top 10 years of US CONUS high temperature deviations are now from the 1930s: 1934, 1931, 1938 and 1939, while only 3 of the top 10 are from the last 10 years (1998, 2006, 1999). Several years (2000, 2002, 2003, 2004) fell well down the leaderboard, behind even 1900. (World rankings of temperature are calculated separately.)

Answer 9

I have never bought into the theory of Al Gore. After all he got the Nobel Prize on an untruth. I will love to see the day he is brought down for creating this hysteria in the world. He claims to be carbon neutral when his house is bigger than the White House. Flies personal jets. Even the talks in Bali presented a problem for there was not enough parking for every ones personal plane. How totally ridiculous. This is a coo for his company to buy back carbon ??. To line his pocket.

Answer 10

I'm already angry about the issue. It has been made into a joke, according to me. Al Gore has made so much money off of this, that it makes me sick. There are so many different aspects to this earth, that there is no one aspect that makes it man made only. Every year, every decade, century, millennium there are differences in the earth's temperature that vary. That's NORMAL! It's normal for us to have warmer years, it's normal to have cooler years. That's just the way it is. Yes, we are contributing to more greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere, but on the flip side, there are more being released by the rain forests in South America. So there is no one contributor to the "global warming".