Okay, once again, a serious question for a gw skeptic.
Why would you plant more trees?
Trees are seasonal, ie their leaves are only around for a short period of time. And for those of you that road the short bus to school, the leaves are what recycles co2 not the trunk or limbs.
Would it not make more sense to plant vine like plants such as kudzu or replace acers of forrest with grass?
You could make an statement about evergreens, however, a blade of grass is much thicker, so I doubt an evergreen needle is going to produce as much oxygen as a blade of grass.
Grass is like the floor in your house or better yet in a store. You don't pay any attention to it, but no matter what happens to the isles (shelves) it's always there and covers every inch, instead of a few random spots.
2007-07-01
00:27:54
·
26 answers
·
asked by
crknapp79
5
in
Global Warming