After all, the wealthy can buy their way out of reducing their carbon footprints. So, the net result is, they pay some money, but they haven't helped the environment at all. Those not among the wealthy can't pay the carbon credits so they have to bear a higher portion of the carbon reduction necessary to save the planet.
Example - Al Gore - one of the biggest individual polluters on the planet due to size of home, use of fossil fuels for heat and power, use of water, pollution due to travel, etc. He can live his lifestyle with no adjustments due to paying carbon credits. Joe Shmo, who lives in a 2000 sq. foot house can't afford to pay for carbon credits ... so he has to take a big hit on his lifestyle by shivering in the winter, taking colder showers, using less water, and driving an even smaller car.....
Why not just require the biggest polluters to do more to stop polluting before requiring the smaller polluters to do that?
2007-06-19
02:23:55
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Other - Environment