Philosophy - December 2007

The remains of the anti-christ are what now remains of the human race. We are not the human race. We are what remains after a sentence of death for the collective murder of Abel. Jesus obviously did not cut it. The only question that remains is; "What can be done at this point to recieve clemency from the capital punishment sentence given to Cain and inherited by us?

2007-12-22 03:57:18 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-22 03:19:12 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

WE the human beings have progressed a lot,we have come a long way from the stone age to the present.And still we are to go a long way. I donot think that we had any chance of conquering the above three that is death, disease and old age.

2007-12-22 03:03:42 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-22 02:49:30 · 34 answers · asked by bob m 3

what are everyone's thoughts on the "world ending talk."
they said it was supposed to end on 666.
now, 2012 or 2013. anyone's thoughts on this? will this happen? and what can we do to prevent it?

2007-12-22 02:41:56 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-22 01:55:58 · 20 answers · asked by Link strikes back 6

2007-12-22 01:54:23 · 10 answers · asked by maureen 3

George Orwell showed us how freedom can be slavery. The other day I saw a definition of freedom that is “when you have nothing left to loose”. What do you think? How do you define freedom? Why?

2007-12-22 01:44:30 · 12 answers · asked by Investor 5

((((HUG))))

Namaste

Peace and Love

2007-12-22 01:34:42 · 4 answers · asked by digilook 2

2007-12-22 01:33:55 · 5 answers · asked by Chelsea 2

2007-12-22 00:26:04 · 7 answers · asked by Nandini 3

2007-12-21 23:57:21 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-21 23:42:00 · 6 answers · asked by Devidas C 2

Is the real reason because you gave the best answer or is it because you said what I wanted to hear most?

2007-12-21 23:28:37 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

"I think, therefore, I ______________"

2007-12-21 23:27:46 · 15 answers · asked by Anthony m 3

good and bad, light and dark, black and white, male and female, yin and yang, everything.

I was once told it is. Or should I ask, is it still?

2007-12-21 23:02:06 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-21 22:55:42 · 7 answers · asked by ___ 5

2007-12-21 22:34:24 · 11 answers · asked by Clipper 3

I know it sounds silly but what reason do i have to believe that i do? There is my physical reality but what do i really understand from that reality?

2007-12-21 21:33:26 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-21 21:16:25 · 10 answers · asked by smily 3

2007-12-21 21:16:11 · 19 answers · asked by small 7

Look at something! and try to describe it with out your senses.
You can think about how you think. You can think about how you think about thinking. But i think no matter how far you go you cant
escape your perspective.
p.s.
I am a very confused person.

2007-12-21 20:46:49 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-21 20:41:20 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Would you rather be Adored; Cherished; Respected or Wanted. You can only pick one not all four, that's cheating! If you like you can put them in order of "importance". Why did you pick the one you did?

Would you rather be thought of by others as Intelligent; Wise or Knowledgeable? Again only one not all three. Why did you pick the one you did? Do you view them as being the different from each other or the same?

2007-12-21 20:32:38 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

Atheists often suggest that theirs is the default position, that there is a presumption of atheism. This places the burden of proof on the theist; if the theist is unable to make a persuasive case for the existence of God, then the atheist is justified in his atheism. The case for the presumption of atheism may be made in two ways, one resulting in a presumption of weak atheism, and the other in a presumption of strong atheism.
If I believe in god and show strong evidence that he must exist if physical reality exist and that evidence is logicaly sound then the only way to ignore that evidence is to evoke faith in dispute of my claims (the physical universe can or does exist without conscious observation) this requires faith because there is no way to verify its claims yet we have verifiable evidence that the universe does not exist as "physical" until a counscious observation is made, also, science seems to indicate that the physical universe existed prior to human consciousness.

2007-12-21 20:30:20 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-21 20:21:34 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

philosophical question:)

2007-12-21 20:09:03 · 23 answers · asked by jannwei_snookie 1

2007-12-21 20:03:26 · 45 answers · asked by om_chessking 2

confused bout everythingg.wat do i do now

2007-12-21 19:28:43 · 11 answers · asked by Liliana 1

2007-12-21 19:04:37 · 8 answers · asked by tripan m 1