Philosophy - May 2007

the one and only question worth 100% on someone's i know philosophy paper. Anyone who gets the A* answer gets the points. Lol
( my friend got an A)

2007-05-14 05:18:25 · 18 answers · asked by DiamondKiss 2

2007-05-14 04:19:38 · 44 answers · asked by John 1

and just be human. Just be a part of a world order.

2007-05-14 04:09:12 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-14 04:03:21 · 14 answers · asked by carol r 1

or is just messing with your head,saying the things they think you want to hear.

2007-05-14 03:49:33 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-14 03:49:10 · 12 answers · asked by who_knows 2

these are the people that dictate how a country distributes money,even our own. And will they be a time in which it would not be prudent for the masters and switch tha script. Please dont say because we are a Christian nation, because hopefully you have heard of the hipo crit. If our nation had a heart, which God knows (for the religous) one has to atone on Gods terms. Just like all the other faiths.I believe that we could definitly fall beause things are supposed to get worse before the thousand year reign comes. In which there will be mass deception to pit bro vs. bro, sis vs sis, mom vs daughter, son vs. father. My father and I have already split he focuses on the after the life but makes sure he walks the walk. Ibelive that once one is enlighted he is doomed to pain and fustration .

What is our form of democracy? Its greed, every man for himself, no matter who u r. Winner take all, I think that helps form hatred, murder, and plan stupidity. Im stupid in areas but not this time

2007-05-14 03:46:26 · 5 answers · asked by Carla P 2

2007-05-14 03:45:03 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

above

2007-05-14 03:41:29 · 3 answers · asked by dan l 2

sun and the rain, can a person still experience the benefits or ill effects if one does not believe in such things?? Are they an illusion or are they real? Does belief make something real??

2007-05-14 03:36:09 · 6 answers · asked by bagel lover 3

2007-05-14 03:36:07 · 6 answers · asked by crish s 1

2007-05-14 02:56:40 · 39 answers · asked by enki 4

2007-05-14 02:56:17 · 9 answers · asked by Masood 1

think, that is different than a person who is not considered normal?

2007-05-14 02:55:26 · 12 answers · asked by bagel lover 3

I am not sure if anyone has asked this before... well, what is it... any theories, is it science, is it God, is it Fate... are we chess pieces being played by a super power. Is there an answer.... well what do you think ? I know its a crazy question, and some will want to give stupid answers, but i really am looking for the most rewarding answer.

2007-05-14 02:38:44 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

The circular argument is like the following:

Premiss. P
therefore, P.

It's obvious that this argument is valid. Then in what sense could we call this argument the fallacy of circular reasoning? Could even valid arguments be fallacy? If any argument is devoid of cogency, then it is fallacy?

2007-05-14 02:35:11 · 7 answers · asked by Hylas 1

if indeed there is some being, or force, beyond our ability to fully understand or know; a being incomprehensibly powerful, and great, then how are we to know the extent of this power? how is it possible to say we know that god is "infinitely" great? infinitely aware? seeing, and having power over all things---always---and everywhere???
couldnt god be the most powerful being of all that is, and yet, might not so great a being have limits to thier power? thier understanding? thier awareness? why is required that god be perfect, and limitless???

2007-05-14 02:32:38 · 24 answers · asked by DZ 1

2007-05-14 01:57:19 · 17 answers · asked by steven c 1

For someone to be kind to someone that they dont know just to get something from them?

2007-05-14 01:47:05 · 18 answers · asked by ? 3

What length's would you go to, to realize your goals or dreams? Aside from hurting others, to achieve those goals!

2007-05-14 01:28:07 · 4 answers · asked by HeatherM 3

2007-05-14 00:41:21 · 13 answers · asked by mouthbreather77 1

2007-05-14 00:37:45 · 10 answers · asked by pileo 1

Do you find you reply in a more open and honest way on here, more than you would talking to a bunch of strangers in a room face to face?

2007-05-14 00:30:31 · 9 answers · asked by CMH 6

Which is more true? (1) Children would be better off not to receive such a falsely bright and happy notion of life which then leads to a lifetime of disillusionment and questioning "where is my bright and happy life?" or (2) Because we create our own realities and fulfill our own prophecies, it is good to instill all positive notions of the future in children's minds? I wonder about these things because I wonder if being unhappy is a product of unrealistic expectations that I have carried from childhood. Would a hard realism have served us all better? Maybe if we were raised to expect unending struggle and hardship, we would find more value in life's natural, incidental pleasures and beauties without waiting for happiness. If, on the contrary, we manifest our hopes and dreams, then we need even MORE optimism. This haunts me as a very essential "either / or" philosophical question about life.

2007-05-14 00:19:11 · 8 answers · asked by uncle 3

2007-05-13 23:44:23 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-13 23:31:53 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Does "SILENCE" has any importance now?

Golden:- it still has importance.
silver:- it has but..but the value is diminishing...
"rusted" :- has no importance now.

how?

2007-05-13 23:22:19 · 34 answers · asked by *~Hope~* 3

2007-05-13 22:25:26 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

In the stone age, people were just struggling to lead a life of hunting and gathering and many perish in the gruelling fights between the wild animals and human. When God was conceptualized?

2007-05-13 21:58:52 · 6 answers · asked by nagarajan s 4

2007-05-13 21:57:05 · 22 answers · asked by muralikrishnarao008 2