think, that is different than a person who is not considered normal?
2007-05-14 02:55:26 · 12 answers · asked by bagel lover 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
i think that by normal you mean average. in which case the majority rules.personally i think that each person is an indvidual and that there is no normal, as each person has his or her own quirks and may be thus defined as abnormal.so as long as you do not deviate too far from the average, then you are normal.
God bless,
gabe
2007-05-14 03:20:49 · answer #1 · answered by gabegm1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If i am a normal person I would have to become a person who is not considered normal to know how that person thinks so i could compare that persons thinking to my normal thinking to see if there are any differences .Is that normal?
2007-05-14 03:40:43 · answer #2 · answered by ROBERT P 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no normal. there is average. a person who is not considered "normal" by his peers or society or whatever would probably have an abstract way of thinking when compared to those around him.
2007-05-14 03:04:02 · answer #3 · answered by Ms. Reyes 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what you consider to be "normal." And where is the dividing line between "normal" and "not normal?"
2007-05-14 03:02:25 · answer #4 · answered by winnie2 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Normal" is a statistical evaluation.... And thus only relative to the group thought of what is "normal".
In other words, in the asylum.... Insanity is "normal".
2007-05-14 03:45:01 · answer #5 · answered by Shaman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the main conventional guy or woman i understand.. is an entire weirdo! haha. jk jk. nicely i dont think of no it is easy to truly be 'customary' every person has flaws, every person makes errors, no person is suitable.. hence, theres no such issues as 'customary' of direction there are human beings obtainable that label human beings as 'customary' or 'weird and wonderful' yet thats in simple terms at their standards.. buttt, that's in simple terms my opinion.. human beings ought to work out it in yet in any different case, i assume. <3333333333333
2017-01-09 20:02:21 · answer #6 · answered by gerdes 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe over here you meant a rational person. " A rational man adjusts himself to his surroundings, an irrational man tries to adjust the surroundings for himself , so all progress depends on the irrational man"
2007-05-14 06:59:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
as all things are differant there is no normal there for if you were normal you would be abnormal
2007-05-14 03:22:14 · answer #8 · answered by henryredwons 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is a "Norm"? But a boundary/rules set by societies / cultures/ religions/ race/ nations/ YOU and ME!
2007-05-14 03:23:03 · answer #9 · answered by lolitakali 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
define "normal"!
l don't believe in labels so can't answer the question on this basis ;o)
2007-05-14 03:02:56 · answer #10 · answered by katerina 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋