Seriously, I really doubt that these were ALL lone gunmans. There had to be at least one that involved organizations or groups. I am talking about the assassinations of JFK, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Lincoln, Ghandi, and Malcom X, not to name many more. Why would all these big influential people be killed by one person? Does anyone here believe that it might have been a larger group using a lone gunman? I mean, there are just too many conspiracy theories around to say that there was a lone gunman for sure. If it really was a lone gunman, why would there be so many different accounts of the same story?
Such as RFK's shooting, there were too many bullets around. JFK, that supposed fourth shot. What do you guys think?
2007-12-27
07:42:53
·
5 answers
·
asked by
codebreaker1011
2