Click the link below, read the article and let's discuss artificial life support. Given the facts of the article, I'm concerned how the mother says she wants her son to die "naturally, the way God intended." But wouldn't "naturally" be without artificial life support? The machines are keeping him alive, not God. I know that most believers in "god" would come back with the fact that those machines are there because of "his" will… but given the facts of just THIS article, how does that play out?
http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/04/25/baby.emilio/index.html
2007-04-25
09:13:00
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Sophie
3
in
Philosophy