What is the best philosophical argument for the existence of God?

Answer 1

Where did the universe come from?

Why would anything exist at all if it hadn't been created by a higher power? The Big Bang happened, but how did the original singularity come into existence?

It's not a philosophical argument, I guess, but to me this is the one argument that convinces me a higher power must exist.

...Of course, this only raises more questions, namely "Why?"

Answer 2

Jiddu Krishnamurti became a hack. UG Krishnamurti (no relation) became the f*cking bomb. I truthfully have been an atheist for my finished existence and a militant religious atheist for various years. Now I see that some human beings at the same time with some interior the bible weren't speaking approximately an entity named god that had wakeful theory. God the author of all issues is the self organizing concept at the back of all creation. In a manner he did create the universe, because of the fact the universe created itself. God the cloud guy who got here to earth and populated this is a thoroughly diverse character. If he has wakeful theory then he's not who i'm speaking approximately. all the arguments for god to exist are terrible. i've got heard MANY and took all of them aside in seconds. If even nevertheless you recognize that god is a manner rather of a topic then there is no would desire to argue because of the fact atheists will agree. the only subject that connects all issues and is omnipresent is the vacuum of area. Atoms are ninety 9% vacuum. area is ninety 9% vacuum. This vacuum is truthfully SO dense that it reasons no sort. this is greater dense than a black hollow. It has all the training. the type is basically the projection of a loss in equilibrium. each and every little thing finally is this vacuum. The invisible cloud guy is a shaggy dog tale and that i could somewhat like it for somebody to objective and tell me i'm incorrect. it is my bread and butter.

Answer 3

Any argument that contains "he," "his," or any reference to a gender or human characteristics is a flawed argument.

One could make the argument that because a seed when planted germanates, sprouts, grows, reproduces, and dies that is "proof" of a god or devine control over life and events. Others will state that a book concieved, written, edited, and interpreted by humans that states there is a god is proof enough of the existence of a god.

Belief alone does not a god make. Emphatic support or assertions that there is a god does not a god make. Belief that there is a human that purports to know the will of a god does not a god make.

There are more arguments why there is NOT a god made in man's image than for.

Answer 4

I answer the question of God:
I'm afraid my answer to this one is: I haven't a clue. In other words, I disthink that any human knows. However, I disbelieve the religious concept of faith.

Reason is: humans are expected to realize truths through empirical data. Therefore, I am sure that the Judeo-Christian God would be informed of this, as He did create us and all. Jesus mentions that faith is a mandatory step to achieving salvation. However, logic (you know, the thing Jesus and Paul used incessantly to prove arguments) and empirical evidence disproves the existence of any deitical precense residing anywhere. Therefore, faith, which can be equated to 'gullibility,' is going against the very philosophies advocated by the popular religions of today!

As to what DOES exist, that is a question that I don't think we can know. We as humans only perceive what is in the world, rather than what is outside. We, of course, realize that we are a lump of dirt suspended in space through this thing called 'gravity.' However, we can only know for SURE that we think, perceive, decide. That gravity will continue, and that the sun will continue it's orbit, is merely VERY probable. However, who necessitates the actions of this rationale? Everything is POSSIBLE, but what is probable?

As life is full of probabilities, it is very probable that an outside entity does indeed exist. This can be seen through the existence of such perceptions as revenge, smiling (the physical action), laughing, sexual pleasure, etc. These things do not add anything to the process of evolution, other than necessity through happiness. However, if Darwin's theory was correct, it would be pointed out that such pleasures are not at all efficient, some even causing extermination (i.e. sexual temptations, heh). These facts lead to a conclusion that evolution is logically shattered.

So the answer is: probably, and possibly, but not necessarily.

Answer 5

Goes like this:

Don't believe, yet God exists: you get eternal damnation.

Do believe and God exists:, you get to go to heaven.

Don't believe and no God: you were right, but otherwise, that's a wash.

Do believe, but there's no god: you missed out on premarital sex and voting for Bush, but it isn't as bad as eternal damnation.

Since you risk the least and gain the most by believing, believe.

... Unless...

Evil God! This version assumes God hates people who only believe in him due to practical risk aversion, and punish you with hell even though you believed because you didn't believe for the right reasons.

In sum, this God business is not something we can rationalize. It is a different sport entirely.

Answer 6

The universe is not one big black hole,

after the big bang there would be a mass that would form a quantum singularity that would be the largest thing in the universe and would slowly re-consume the entire Universe. There is not such beast out there.

At a min. there would be a large layer of well nova or super nova matter and that doesn't exist either, but in time it would have reformed and black hole again.

God spread matter throw the universe in this beginning.

Answer 7

in my estimation (since ive studied the subject for 30 years)you asking the question is the best arguement . if you had an answer you would not ask the question . you either admit a god or you do not. its a matter of belief. you have all grown up with a belief system .im going to give you a clue . give me a reason for your existence

Answer 8

There isn't one. It is the choice of whomever to believe or not to believe. Freedom of choice, freedom of beliefs, freedom of actions. When one has faith, they believe without seeing, therefore no argument is necessary. If one asks for proof, that is all the proof needed to know that the existence of God is a discussion that can and has been going on for ages.

Answer 9

"God dwells within you as you". "The mind is not for thinking, the mind is for receiving thought". God is the thinker. we must merge the mind and heart to experience God in Unconditional love within our own hearts. If you do not know this, then ask your own subconscious mind and see what God gives you. The best way to end all argument on the matter is to Get still and listen to the gentle prompting of the spirit of God within your own heart. Can you get that still?

Answer 10

A "best" argument does not exist...else we would not have the religion/spirituality questions on the board, right?
This is one of those "free-will" choice matters that each individual must come to on their own.