I've found some cheaters, or at least what appear to be people with multiple accounts, or a group of friends that vote for each others answers, or something to do with promoting Napolean Hill
http://answers.yahoo.com/my/profile?show=995394df5d8cb4e8473c170e93ec0e90aa
http://answers.yahoo.com/my/profile?show=2a09579bef8eb488bd246a0ef80a8f84aa
Anyway, is this at all wrong? I feel it is, but then I realize that voted on answers are usually worse then answers chosen by askers. I also have to wonder, if more people voted would that fix the problem or make it worse :P
I feel it's wrong because it seems like they are just promoting things, some of what they say is just wrong, like the 10% of the brain myth :P
http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percnt.htm
2006-08-26
05:21:18
·
12 answers
·
asked by
humean9
3
in
Philosophy