I know a few athiests and they have admitted its rubbish because it shows what an unconvicing athiest richard dawkins really is, I read it the other week and I totally agree.
In his arguments against God, the sloppy thinking gets even worse. We are repeatedly assured that a universe where God existed would be very different from one where he did not. This, Dawkins claims, makes God a scientific hypothesis. But we are never told how the universe would be different if God didn’t exist, or what experiment we should do to verify his non-existence. The treatment of the traditional proofs of God's existence is largely an attack on straw men. The cosmological argument is far stronger than Dawkins gives it credit for and he does not bother interact with its modern proponents like William Lane Craig. On the ontological argument, Alvin Plantinga is the man to go to, but Dawkins goes nowhere near him.
I'm not against athiests what so ever but richard dawkin really is pathetic!
2007-10-27
02:01:02
·
21 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality