see my last question before answering this please
2007-10-27
01:57:41
·
23 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
not that question the one that reads what is proof
2007-10-27
02:02:13 ·
update #1
i do want to start a crazy debate
2007-10-27
02:03:57 ·
update #2
I mean things like that god is anthropocentric can performe miracles etc
2007-10-27
02:40:28 ·
update #3
what the church tried to stop Gallileo all the way. The Christians where saying he was wrong etc. that much i am sure about. gallileo proved it the bible doesn't prove it (doesn't) state it
2007-10-27
03:33:14 ·
update #4
I am a bit annoyed that people diddn't answer the question what is proof before answering here
2007-10-27
03:35:28 ·
update #5
Nope. At least not the important stuff like the divinity of jesus, the existance of god, the existnance of souls, heaven, hell, angels, etc. Not one shred of evidence.
Thats why its called faith.
2007-10-27 02:00:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
You want evidence that supports the Bible. Okay, here's a list.
1.) It's a unique book - It's the most widely distributed book in history. The Bible has been printed at least 4.7 BILLION times, in more than 2,400 languages. The Bible has endured bans and attacks from opposers.
2.) It is historically sound - People who are named in the Bible have been found to exist. Pontius Pilate, the Roman Governor of Judea - his name was found on a stone in Caesarea in 1961. Events that happened in the Bible are proven to have happened. The account of Edom and Israel battling was one such event that proved to be true.
3.) Candor and honesty - Not only are their achevements recorded, but the people of the Bible also recorded their shortcomings and errors. Moses told of a mistake he made, Jonah made a big mistake and landed in the belly of a fish. Even the Apostle Paul humbly admitted that he made mistakes.
4.) Internal Harmony - There were 40 men who wrote the Bible in the span of some 1,600 years. And yet, they wrote about the same theme - a harmonious message - God's Kingdom. From Genesis to Revelation, this theme can be found.
5.) Scientific Accuracy - People used to believe that the earth was flat, but the Bible told that it was round. (Isaiah 40:22) People believed that the earth was held up in th universe by a giant animal, the Bible told that it hung on nothing. (Job 26:7)
6.) Fulfilled Prophesy - Bible predictions are usually precise and have been fulfilled down to the last detail. Consider as an example - Isiah prophesied that Babylon would fall, that the leader "Cyrus" would be the conquerer, and that the river Euphrates would dry up. Two hundred years later, the prophesies all came true as confirmed by historian Herodotus of the 5th century.
The Bible is God's Word and has practical advice for us today.
2007-10-27 03:24:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by SisterCF 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
There are two things that need proof here. First is the issue of moral precepts contained therein. Moral precepts do not need proof. You either accept or reject it. The second is the veracity of the events and personalities mentioned therein. There is where the problem lies. Most of the narratives in the Old Testament (Christian bible, Jewish Torah and Muslim Quran) are clearly based on a collection of ancient Jewish Legends. However, the fact that these narratives are just probably based on legends does not in anyway invalidate the moral precepts in these sacred documents. the bible or the4 quran should not be treated as a documentary of ancient history.
2007-10-27 02:14:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by akoypinoy 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
interior the e book of Luke interior the Bible there became a king stated who became for some years theory to be incorrect. a cutting-edge archeological locate proved Luke to be precise. i'm no longer attentive to the type of proofs interior the Koran.
2016-12-18 18:33:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by hillhouse 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it depends which parts you mean there is proof of many events that are descibed in the old testament, but that doesn't mean they had anything to do with a god. i cant comment on the koran because i haven't read it. the bloke that wrote it, i think was called mohamed he is supposed to be a historical figure but thats as much as i know about him
2007-10-27 02:36:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, i mean it made sence to assume a super natural being several thousand years ago, they had nothing else. the only reason religon is still as part of our society (be that a good thing or not) is because of insistant parents and inheritance, which, i persieve to be unfair. they do not make their own mind up only follow what they've been taught by what they considered respectful figures. hence, they are so defencive and passionate. religious folk always see only the togetherness and sence of community, but never think of the hundreds of years of ignorance as a result. i dont think the sacrifice was worth it. but thaty is my opinion, and a bias one.
2007-10-27 02:09:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nick 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Hi.....
TOTALLY 100% NO, NONE , ZERO PROOF!!!!!
The Bible, both Old & New Testaments and the Qur'an are totally....
MAN-MADE FICTION!!!!!
Ps....
To: 'General Custer'
Who stated:
'In reply to Paul222@England.
You should learn more about the subject you are debating'.
In answer, because you have not responded to my email!!
I know more about the subject in question, than you obviously ever will!!!
I went to the site you mentioned for some ..er 'wisdom'!!
The first sentence on the site states:
'The words of Allah are never to be questioned; it is says so in the infallible Koran'
I have never heard such total rubbish!!!
You have absolutely NO idea of what 'wisdom' is!!
In my opinion, you are just yet another deluded, brainwashed fool!!!
2007-10-27 02:30:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Paul222@England 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
None. Archaeologists have spent decades digging all over the "holy land" and have come up with nothing to prove that the events in the Old Testament ever took place.
2007-10-27 02:03:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Well....most of the cities are real places. I don't know if that is really proof or not. But at least they got a few things right.
2007-10-27 02:01:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Dead Sea Scrolls support the Bible.
2007-10-27 02:01:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Atan 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
This Q doesn't make any sense to me. See my answer to your first question.
2007-10-27 02:12:49
·
answer #11
·
answered by Steven Ring 3
·
0⤊
0⤋