English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

All categories - 8 July 2007

Arts & Humanities · Beauty & Style · Business & Finance · Cars & Transportation · Computers & Internet · Consumer Electronics · Dining Out · Education & Reference · Entertainment & Music · Environment · Family & Relationships · Food & Drink · Games & Recreation · Health · Home & Garden · Local Businesses · News & Events · Pets · Politics & Government · Pregnancy & Parenting · Science & Mathematics · Social Science · Society & Culture · Sports · Travel

I remember when I overdosed on pills, trying to commit suicide, & I was knocked out cold, & I woke up in handcuffs. & one time when I was really young, my foster dad had pneumonia & was having a seizure & had a massive stroke & died, & they put him in handcuffs during his seizure.

I think that's pretty cruel to put an ill person in handcuffs.

2007-07-08 15:22:00 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Health

If it meant we would not dependent on some countries in the world that are not very friendly to the U.S. How about doing a little more walking? Its free and its great for the health. Would eliminate alot of the obesity in our country.

2007-07-08 15:21:36 · 9 answers · asked by nellie 3 in Other - Cars & Transportation

2007-07-08 15:21:29 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Physics

what could it mean???

2007-07-08 15:21:12 · 5 answers · asked by Kerilyn 7 in Psychology

2007-07-08 15:20:48 · 25 answers · asked by Hi 1 in Philosophy

Christianity never treated women as objects like the first seven Presidents of the Church of Jesus Christ and Latter Day Saints. Don't believe me? Mormonism was founded on polygamy. Follow the link and read the proof for yourself!

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070708182600AA0aKfm

The last polygamist Mormon president died during World War II. Hmm...not that long ago Mormons! But then the Church of Jesus Christ and Latter Day Saints is one of the newest churches as well as the only church in America to embrace and condone polygamy.

No other church has embraced polygamy. Brigham Young makes Henry VIII look like a real Saint! In the Catholic church Saint is a title of honor and not merely a name attributed to just anyone. The Roman Catholic Church is the original Christian church founded by Jesus the Christ himself whilst these other churches were founded by men and the teachings of man rather than the teachings of God. Jesus is God, Mormons!

2007-07-08 15:20:43 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Religion & Spirituality

im writing a song and i want it to connect with the general public. something almost every one has gone through. i also want this song to be light hearted. no "my girl dumped me" or "my dad died while he slapped m". and no cheesy "put a smile on "stuff. real emotion. u hav suggestion

2007-07-08 15:20:33 · 6 answers · asked by Temporary Sadness 3 in Other - Music

Why do white people say Egypt is NOT part of Africa? History shows that white people have invaded, raped, robbed and stole for every decent terroritory the possibly could? Why do they want to steal and claim places that did NOT originally belong to them?

2007-07-08 15:20:26 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Cultures & Groups

long story short.
1.5 years ago i had a still born.
cried every day and was depressed.
got put on zoloft.
now i'm waaay better.
now i'm pregnant. 5 weeks.
should i quit cold turkey? with the zoloft i mean. or should i slowly taper it? can it harm the baby if i take it?

thanks

2007-07-08 15:20:15 · 7 answers · asked by chapped lips 5 in Other - Diseases

no more avatar twin! how do you like me now? remember me? check my last question and you'll understand.

2007-07-08 15:19:58 · 18 answers · asked by Marge 5 in Polls & Surveys

2007-07-08 15:19:47 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Polls & Surveys

o0ki. so0 i have gone out with this guy before .. and then we broke up because he thought he was to0 younge to be in love.. so0 we dated other people but we whould still hung out and ho0ked up while we were both taken. for the past 6 months.. and now were both single.. and were starting to0 talk like we might get back toghtther again. and he calls me all the time. i never call him unless if im calling him back.. should i call him everyonce and a while? or should i let him chase after me?

also, i really like him but i dont want to fall to easly for him again and then just get hurt. im trying to keep my distance but we talk all the time. and we have been hanging out alot to now. what shoul di do0? about these things cuz i really want to be with him. but im not sure if he wants to be in a serious realtionship this time.?

ahh hellpp!! :[

2007-07-08 15:19:47 · 7 answers · asked by onelove4meh15 1 in Singles & Dating

I was texting this guy after midnight and I said to him at the end of our conversation, " Have Sweet Dreams Babe", do you think he took the message that I was flirting with him and that I wanted his Sweet Dreams to be about me?

2007-07-08 15:19:40 · 36 answers · asked by Kemma 3 in Singles & Dating

http://www.mises.org/story/2520
Ron Paul has always believed that foreign and domestic policy should be conducted according to the same principles. Government should be restrained from intervening at home or abroad because its actions fail to achieve their stated aims, create more harm than good, shrink the liberty of the people, and violate rights.
Does that proposition seem radical? Outlandish or farflung? Once you hear it stated, it makes perfect sense that there is no sharp distinction between the principles of domestic and foreign policy. They are part of the same analytical fabric. What would be inconsistent would be to favor activist government at home but restraint abroad, or the reverse: restraint at home and activism abroad. Government unleashed behaves in its own interests, and will not restrict itself in any area of life. It must be curbed in all areas of life lest freedom suffer.
If you recognize the line of thinking in this set of beliefs, it might be because you have read the Federalist Papers, the writings of Thomas Jefferson or George Washington or James Madison, or examined the philosophical origins of the American Revolution. Or perhaps you have read the speeches and books against FDR's New Deal: the same group warned of the devastating consequences of World War II.
Not only does this Paulian view have a precedent in American history; it sums up the very core of what is distinctive about the American contribution to political ideas. The proposition was and is that people are better able to manage their lives than government can manage them. Under conditions of liberty, the result is prosperity and orderly civilization. Under government control, the result is relative poverty and unpredictable chaos. The proof is in the news every day.
He takes the ideas of Washington and Jefferson seriously, just as seriously as he takes the idea of freedom itself, and he does so in times when faith in Leviathan remains the dominant political ideology.
Ideology is such a powerful force that it has propped up policy inconsistency for more than a century. The Left has a massive agenda for the state at home, and yet complains bitterly, with shock and dismay, that the same tools are used to start wars and build imperial structures abroad. The Right claims to want to restrain government at home (at least in some ways) while whooping it up for war and global reconstruction abroad.
It doesn't take a game-theory genius to predict how this conflict works itself out in the long run. The Left and the Right agree to disagree on intellectual grounds but otherwise engage in a dangerous quid pro quo. They turn a blind eye to the government they don't like so long as they get the government they do like.
It's one thing for the Left to grudgingly support international intervention. It makes some sense for a group that believes that government is omniscient enough to bring about fairness, justice, and equality at home to do the same for people abroad. In fact, I've never been able to make much sense out of left-wing antiwar activism, simply because it cuts so much against the idea of socialism, which itself can be summed up as perpetual war on the liberty and property of the people.
What strikes me as ridiculous is the right-wing view that the same government that is incompetent and dangerous domestically — at least in economic and social affairs — has some sort of Midas Touch internationally such that it can bring freedom, democracy, and justice to any land its troops deign to invade.
The freedom to trade internationally is an essential principle. It means that consumers should not be penalized for buying from anyone, or selling to anyone, regardless of their residence. Nor should domestic suppliers be granted anything like a monopoly or subsidized treatment. Nor should trade be used as a weapon in the form of sanctions. Ron Paul has upheld these principles as well, which makes him an old-fashioned liberal in the manner of Cobden and Bright and the American Southern tradition. He has also rejected the mistake of many free traders who believe that a military arm is necessary to back the invisible hand of the marketplace. For Ron Paul, freedom is all of a piece.
Ron Paul's singular voice on foreign affairs has done so much to keep the flame of a consistent liberty burning in times when it might otherwise have been extinguished. He has drawn public attention to the ideas of the founders. He has alerted people to the dangers of empire. He has linked domestic and foreign affairs through libertarian analytics, even when others have been bamboozled by the lies or too intimidated to contradict them. He has told the truth, always. For this, every American, every citizen of the world, is deeply in his debt. In fact, I'm willing to predict that a hundred years from now and more, when all the current office holders are all but forgotten, Ron Paul's name will be remembered as a bright light in dark times (we are in the right side of history).We can't but be deeply grateful that Ron Paul's prophetic words. May its lessons be absorbed by this and future generations. May this treatise stand as an example of how to fight for what is right even when everyone else is silent. May it always be regarded as proof that there were men of courage alive in the first decade of the third millennium. May public and intellectual opinion someday rise to its level of intellectual sophistication and moral valor.

2007-07-08 15:19:30 · 13 answers · asked by MIkE ALEGRIA 1 in Elections

2007-07-08 15:19:26 · 5 answers · asked by bball3910 1 in Other - Internet

I see it on television all of the time, and it's always followed by a gourmet-type dinner. Any recipes would be appreciated as well!

2007-07-08 15:19:19 · 9 answers · asked by aanstalokaniskiodov_nikolai 5 in Law & Ethics

John Kerry thinks Edwards does it. Cindy Sheehan certainly does it.

2007-07-08 15:19:18 · 15 answers · asked by wallyshields 2 in Politics

I'm thinking about naming a star after my grandmother. Her and I are very close...but I'm having a hard time thinking of a good name. Any ideas?

2007-07-08 15:19:15 · 11 answers · asked by Brittany M 2 in Astronomy & Space

Does anyone know what it means if your liver function test or SGPT is elevated to 82 when the range is 30-65? I've tried looking it up on WebMD, etc. but I don't find the answer I'm looking for. Could it be caused from diabetes and/or high cholesterol?

2007-07-08 15:19:12 · 1 answers · asked by CLR 1 in Other - Health

oh and be nice play fair and have fun rude comments no no here

2007-07-08 15:18:40 · 25 answers · asked by marsh 7 in Polls & Surveys

For a PC to have a broadband connection?

Processor, RAM, Video, etc...

2007-07-08 15:18:31 · 8 answers · asked by Buddy Hodor 7 in Other - Computers

It rained real bad here a few days ago and I ended up driving through high standing water. The next day, my truck started squeaking when I sat in it, turned the wheel, or hit a speed bump. What is going on? Any advice would be great. It is a 1996 Ford Explorer.

2007-07-08 15:18:31 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Maintenance & Repairs

I have an arthritic hip. Usual symptoms. Lately I have had very bad pain in the bones in my legs (both). THe pain is in my shins the most and travels through my leg bones both legs. I do take celebrex for the hip. Anyone have any ideas? My Dr hasnt got a clue.

2007-07-08 15:18:30 · 2 answers · asked by rose 3 in Pain & Pain Management

In order to prepare you to wear garments when you're an adult?

2007-07-08 15:18:28 · 14 answers · asked by Al Shaitan 3 in Religion & Spirituality

fedest.com, questions and answers