Now, we can all agree that "natural" is not a synonym for "everything"... So we can agree that "nature" has limits... Correct me if I am wrong... So what is "nature"? What is "natural"? Is it more likely that male/female intercourse - which "nature" "selected" for reproduction is - is closer to a consensus definition for "nature"... as opposed to same-sex sex, which seems to have been created purely for selfish reasons (pleasure, "love", etc)... If we can agree that "nature" is somewhat ambiguous, then what "ought" to be the (non-selfish) generally accepted definition...
P.S. I support letting gay people live their lives. I do not support gay people coming out of their closet and into my daughter's living room. Also, I found it disgusting that Governor McGreevey (New Jersey) completely, completely, put his feelings above those of his children and his ex-wife. He made an issue of homosexuality when the issue was his infidelity. Why did not ONE gay person disapprove?
2007-03-19
03:39:47
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender