It has to do with the "Positive Scientific Proof" that the Atheist always mention. Remember 1980, and Mt. St. Helen? It was a tremendous volcano in Washington State. In 1990, some geologist went there and collected rocks. They sent these samples to various laboratories to be tested and dated, using various testing methods. These were the same laboratories, using the same methods that they use for dating fossils, and other rock samples to date the age of the earth. The dates that these laboratories came up with for the age of the rocks were as young as 10,000 years to as much as 2,000,000 years, depending on the laboratory. This is a big discrepency in dates, especially when you realize that the rocks were only 10 years old at the time!!
Can any of you Atheist in here explain the errors that these laboratories made, and why should we believe any of the old dates they have given on other samples?
2006-12-22
12:34:44
·
7 answers
·
asked by
ted.nardo
4
in
Religion & Spirituality