If he revealed himself today, then we could record the "miracles" and analyse them properly, and if they were real we would not be able to explain them scientifically, leading to the hypothesis that he may be miraculous (we might not accept them as miracles, but we couldn't discount them either).
2000 years ago, they believed people ressurected when they rose from coma's. Why should we beleive the accounts from people who had not yet learned of scientific inquiry.
The bible could never be used as evidence in a trial, it's hearasy, and not real evidence.
Why would god risk having BILLLIONS of souls go to hell, rather than reveal himself?
Or is it all wrong to begin with. The bible is false.
http://flushaholybook.com
2006-10-03
15:38:32
·
24 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality