Libs argue that contraception other than abstinence is needed since some people don't/can't use abstinence, i.e., they can't repress their sexual drives. But it turns out that contraception other than abstinence is not completely secure, unlike abstinence. There's always the risk that the contraceptive method won't work properly or that it won't get used properly. In addition, many times libs talk about the "kids" not being able to control their "urges". Turns out it's also the kids who're prone to using contraceptive methods improperly/carelessly. What about contraception giving a false sense of security and causing more risks than it prevents? Plus the typical lib argument is that society shouldn't care about their private lives, but what if the contraceptive method fails? It does happen, and then it's not just a private thing anymore (e.g., pregnancy/abortion, sexually transmitted diseases). For God's sake, isn't abstinence just easier, or do the "kids" have to behave like animals?
2006-09-08
11:21:23
·
9 answers
·
asked by
me
5
in
Politics