These are a few areas of information I use to rebut the Gay Community's fight for special right:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad362.pdf
Leviticus 18:21-23
21And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD.
22Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
23Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion.
2006-09-08
11:22:06
·
38 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Cultures & Groups
➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Leviticus 20:12-14
12And if a man lie with his daughter in law, both of them shall surely be put to death: they have wrought confusion; their blood shall be upon them.
13If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
14And if a man take a wife and her mother, it is wickedness: they shall be burnt with fire, both he and they; that there be no wickedness among you.
1 Corinthians 6:8-10
8Nay, ye do wrong, and defraud, and that your brethren.
9Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
2006-09-08
11:23:07 ·
update #1
1 Timothy 1:9-11
9Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
10For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;
11According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust.
James 3:6-8
6And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell.
7For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things in the sea, is tamed, and hath been tamed of mankind:
8But the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.
2006-09-08
11:24:13 ·
update #2
A few government research documents:
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/osr/site/eip/pdf/Friedman-2000-factors%20influencing%20hep%20a%20vaccination%20of%20msms%20during%20a%20community-wide%20campaign.pdf
http://www.cdc.gov/std/program/community.pdf
http://www.cdc.gov/std/healthcomm/SyphElimConcept2002.pdf
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hepatitis/biblio/CDC_2003_PrevHepCorrectSet.pdf
With all this this coming from the government its self, why do people ignore it.
2006-09-08
11:43:32 ·
update #3
I see you have done your home work, good job. I would leave them to the Lord in the end he will have the final say so,after all He is the Alpha and the Omega the beginning and the end the Creator of Heaven and Earth. ENOUGH SAID. Have a GREAT WEEKEND.
2006-09-08 11:34:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by sweettoni37 4
·
1⤊
6⤋
the bible is God's word, but it has over and over again been transcribed by men, and so is tainted, corrupt, and ungodly, by our own hands. none of these things are half decent arguments against homosexuality to begin with, just loosely related, and some are utter nonsense (Leviticus 18:21 {yeah, and none of our other cells are allowed to die either, and all women who've had more than one period are serial killers. sheesh.} 22 {so, no one can ever be with anyone but a hermaphrodite?} 1 Corinthians 6:8 {what exactly does that mean? and that your brethren what? that they seem to be happy when under you and nude?} 11 {see first comment}, and all of James 3:6-8 is entirely irrelevant.) all your government pdf files show only that they are more likely to contract STDs, nothing for or against them.
we don't deserve "special" rights, but we do deserve the "same" rights, just as two different races deserve the same rights. we're all people, and to you we should all be God's children. saying otherwise is unchristian. (shake your rosary at that :P )
if anyone who reads this is a homophobe, just know this:
no offense, but most of you aren't our type(s) anyway.
2006-09-08 13:15:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by eri_mizawa 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
It occurs to me that picking apart scripture for the sake of sound-bytes is perhaps contradictory to the intended purpose of the Bible.
One might note that Old Testament laws are neither weighed nor ordered from most grievous of sins to slightest of misdemeanors. Given this, it should be pointed out that the consumption of pork and shrimp also constitute damnable sin -- to say nothing of cheeseburgers! If one cannot confirm that one sin is worse than another, then it is safe to conclude that homosexuality is no worse than eating bacon.
Also of note is the concept of renunciation of the Talmudic laws. These laws, or 'commandments' (of which there are 613, including the big 10) are the backbone of the Old Testament. Modern Christianity places emphasis exclusively on the 10 laws ('commandments') presented to Moses on Mount Sinai, and by and large disregards the other 603. Case in point of this is the fact that consumption of cheeseburgers and bacon is not deemed "damnable" to the modern Christian, while murder is.
The policy of choosing those laws that best fit contemporary moral sentiment is, at the least, contradictory to the core nature of the faith. At worst, it is a de-facto witchhunt; when one is free to define the law in any way he pleases, the identification of criminals ('sinners' for the sake of this particular example) becomes arbitrary. i.e: The Old Testament also requires that all male children be circumcized, but we do not see televangelists warning the 'uncut' to repent, lest they burn for eternity.
It is not my place, nor my intention, to dictate the morality of any other. However, I do not feel that one can pick and choose the parts of a so-called Holy script as one pleases and still rightfully call themselves an obedient follower of that script.
p.s. Forgive me for the poor construction of this argument -- I'm kind of rushed -- dinner is almost ready!!
2006-09-08 12:02:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mr. M. Mond 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
each and every now and then that's been documented that animals contained in the wild have been prevalent to kill and eat their youthful...it happens in nature...there fore that's a organic act. organic isn't accepted. that's not accepted for an animal contained in the wild to eat that's very own offspring. Homosexuality has been documented in nature between some animals. It happens in nature...there fore that's a organic act. besides the indisputable fact that it definitely isn't a classic prevalence in nature...homosexuality is organic besides the indisputable fact that it maximum in all probability heavily isn't accepted. Human homosexuals make up under 5% of the worlds inhabitants, actually closer to a million to 2%, yet even at 5 % of the inhabitants they are nonetheless 40 5% far off from even being near to being seen accepted. The Gays could be merely as cheating because of the fact the christians while it includes justifying their marvelous sexual orientation, they have been tossing around the "homosexuality is organic" argument for it sluggish now, they gain this hoping that all and sundry isn't clever sufficient to comprehend the version between organic and accepted and that they might initiate thinking they are being unfair to decide homosexuals as being marvelous. i've got not got a undertaking with homosexuals except they provide me reason to have a undertaking. in the event that they initiate annoying that accepted human beings could desire to tutor their toddlers that homosexuality is accepted...then we've a undertaking. i won't deceive my toddlers. merely as i won't deceive them and tell them a touch one murdering e book god is worth of worship. no person forces their ideals on me and people who attempt will fail.
2016-09-30 11:53:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by bungay 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your question assumes that the authority on the subject of homosexuality is a text written in the year 57A.D. Now, I am no exprert in sociology but since 57A.D. we have radically changed how we think about our planet and those around us. In 57A.D. there was no voting, there was no democracy, there was no equal rights, there was no standard education... I mean you are taking your morality and concept of "right" based on a text from a time when having slaves to do your work was commonplace and if someone stole your bread, it was okay to cut off their hand. If you want to follow this borderline heathenistic code, more power to you, just expect the more advanced and civilized types to call you things like stupid, idiot, bigotrous, and a retard.
Grow up, learn that each person gets a neat, unique set of neurons and they can do with those neurons whatever they want to and you have no power to change what they want to and no right to judge how they deal with their neurons. If they want to go around rubbing their stomach and patting their head for the rest of their life, they can do that and so can you. If you want to. Free will. Respect yours, and respect others.
Homosexuality is not "right" or "wrong".
2006-09-08 11:30:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Allen G 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Very simple, much like your thought processes...I'll keep it short and sweet.
Jesus does not run this country.
It's Illegal to attempt to force me to live by your Mythology.
Diseases only infect those that CATCH the disease, there are ways to protect yourself as well as the fact that they are NOT a Judgment from God.
Shove your Bible, God and Jesus straight up your sanctimonious butt.
I want no part of them. Now to quote that which you claim to hold holy, Go not into the Land of the Pagans or the Samaritans and if they will not receive you shake the dust from your feet and move on.
2006-09-08 12:18:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Same-sex couples are not asking for "special rights," only equal rights.
Homosexuality did not cause HIV/AIDS. It's a disease, not an avenging angel sent by God, and preys upon humans of all ages, genders, lifestyles, and walks of life.
There is no rational, moral reason why two unmarried, consenting adults of the same-sex should be denied the right to marry if that is their desire.
2006-09-08 12:48:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why go into the LGBT part of this and put this stuff on ? im a christian , i live a good life and im a nice person and i believe if there is a god it is up to them to judge me . I do not beleive it is anyone elses place to say this . Ok so its your religion but why try to force it down someone elses throat ? i just dont understand the reason for this ?
Your just being mean for the sake of being mean !
2006-09-08 11:31:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by alex 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Thou Straight Eunuchs Shalt Not Be A Pain In The A-SS.
2006-09-08 11:24:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Azhdeha 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Gays are not asking for a "special right", just for the same rights as everyone else. All of your refutations come from the Bible, which was written by patriarchal men, not by God/Goddess. Jesus Christ would detest your Bible and what patriarchal men have said and done in his name. Go to another area of Yahoo Answers, this section is not for you.
2006-09-08 11:58:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by irongrama 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
It is not your place to judge someone that is gay.Statistics say that your sexual DNA is determined by the time you are 6 yrs old.
People don't choose to be gay or straight,your gene pool does.
2006-09-08 14:40:04
·
answer #11
·
answered by Celebrity girl 7
·
0⤊
0⤋