I understand two very good players were suspended, but they weren't suspended for no reason. The NBA after the big brawl said if a player leaves the bench without a substitution or timeout, he is suspended. Amare and Diaw did just that and they got suspended. They then argue that since it was the playoffs the NBA should have changed the rules or should have been leniant. The NBA didn't make any sort of anouncement about a changed rule, so they can't change it after the player commited the crime. I then hear that since it was Amare stoudemire it should have been a free pass. Well, the NBA doesn't make rules for a select few. All rules apply to everyone.
Did the suspensions cost the suns game 5? YES. Was the NBA right in giving suspensions? YES.
After Amare Stoudewhiner made the comments on bowen and ginobili being dirty, Popvich said h'es talented but he's young. Well, Amare made a "young" mistake and payed for it. The spurs are experienced and keep there cool. Nash acted when he fell
2007-05-17
13:43:43
·
13 answers
·
asked by
anonymous
3