well, im an athiest, but what i dont understand is why the church are attacing this book so ferociously. yes, the author claims its true, personaklly im mixed, but why so savage on getting it banned?
okay for a start, for the book to work, jesus needs to have existed, but as a mortal man, not gods son.... this does seem more passable than an supreme being (if one even exists)
and for those who have actually read / seen it, darrne brown is not trying to crush christianity. hes just pointing out the truth
whis is fact does work. its been known that the bible has been severly edited over the years by the catholic church (even if they deny it...)
what im saying is, why deny your past church? and why so defensive? it just seems odd....
2006-07-02
07:16:38
·
37 answers
·
asked by
Adam (AM)
4