There are the arguments against paying for the lazy and drug addicted, but I will take it one step further. Why should we pay for those who could sacrifice other things. The "poor" in America have cell phones, nice cars, cable television, etc. The poor in other countries have none of these, and occasionally get food with their meals.
When I moved out of my parents home, I paid my own way through college with grants, scholarships, and loans, and a full-time job. I only attained an associates degree at the time, then I worked for another 3 years at an average of 80 hours a week. Then I started a business. During these 10 years, I did not have a car, phone, cable TV, nothing. I lived 10 years like few would so I can live the rest of my life like few can. Why should I pay for those not willing to make the same sacrifices?
2007-10-31
22:55:13
·
21 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous