Hello,
Reading a book named The Queen's English ,
I found a sentence confusing me.
Writer says it's wrong in terms of grammar to say "The national interest is not increasing food production."
What I think is that since this sentence consists of a subject,
verb (is), and a noun,
*The national interest = subeject.
* is = be
* not increasing = a gerund acting as a noun.
There's nothing wroing in this sentencce.
If i am wrong , what is the difference in terms of grammar
between saying the national interest is not increasing production and he is not a student, when the two sentences
have their subjects, be and nouns.
would clearly tell me why i am wrong and how I can make a better sentence?
one more thing,
* He would not cave in to international pressure over climate change.
* He would not cave in on capital penalty.
I am wondering why the first sentence has "to" after cave in
whereas the second has "on" after cave in.
How do you know when to use on or to?
2007-06-04
19:47:44
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous