A cursory glance at history might suggest that ‘white’ societies have been instrumental in creating ‘civilisation’, but is this true and, even if so, has being ‘white’ got anything to do with it?
I would suggest that the assumption that that ‘white’ societies have been instrumental in creating ‘civilisation’ is false and that any apparent connection between ‘white’ and ‘civilisation’ is a non-sequetor.
Firstly, pale skin colour is an evolutionary adaptation to colder, less sunny climates where the risk of skin cancer is outweighed by the need to produce vitamin D from limited skin exposure to the sun. I would suggest that it is the migration to cooler climates which facilitated the development of settled communities, as opposed to a nomadic lifestyle, that lead to civilization developing. It is hard to be creative when your every waking moment is occupied in the search for food or water as can be the case in Africa.
Secondly, ‘civilized’ societies have developed independently in many places during history – the Aztecs, Incas and Mayan cultures of Southern America; Ancient Egypt; China; India; not forgetting Mesopotamia. The majority of these societies would not be described as ‘white’.
2007-03-05
04:09:32
·
19 answers
·
asked by
SLH
4