How long before we begin to cull our own species, not by war, famine or disease, but actually take the decision to cut down our numbers before we have no space left to grow enough food to feed us all? If it is ethically OK for us to take the decision to control population size in other species, why would it be so wrong to ensure our own 'survival of the fittest' by having a cull of the weaker human members of our population?
(Before you get all hot and bothered, I'm not suggesting that it is a good option, I just want to know how it stands as a resolution to increasing population in a moral stance).
2006-08-05
03:54:48
·
21 answers
·
asked by
CC...x
5