Paretan newspaper editor: David Salino assails as distorted our quotation of remarks on Paretan values by the Quinkoan prime minister and bemoans what he sees as the likely consequences for paretan-Qinkoan relations. Those consequences will not be our fault, however, since officials at the Qinkoan embassy and scholars at the Institute of Qinkoan Studies have all confirmed that, as printed, our quotation was an acceptable translation of the prime minister's remarks. No newspaper can fairly be blamed for the consequences of its reporting when that reporting is accurate.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the editor's argument depends?
(A) The confirmation that the translation is acceptable is sufficient to show that the prim minister’s remarks were accurately reported.
(B) Newspapers out not to consider the consequences of their coverage in deciding what to report.
(C) If the newspaper’s rendering of the prime minister’s remarks was not distorted, then there is no reason to fear adverse consequences from reporting the remarks.
(D) If David Salino was prepared to praise the newspaper for any favorable consequences of quoting the prime minister’s remarks, he could then hold the newspaper to blame for adverse consequences.
(E) Only scholars or people with official standing are in a position to pass judgment on whether a translation of Qinkoan into Paretan is acceptable.
2007-08-23
15:09:47
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Cypocryphy
2
in
Psychology