Astronomy & Space - September 2007

so according to string theory and m-theory there is an infinite number of universe each with different laws of physics. and that every single outcome of anything is in one of the infinite many universes. so doesn't that mean that in at least a few universes string theory is wrong. so doesn't that prove the whole thing?

2007-09-29 05:30:33 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

please answer quickly

2007-09-29 05:27:11 · 15 answers · asked by srinath 1

2007-09-29 05:23:57 · 17 answers · asked by Diana Y 1

Does it just stop some place out there or does it go on and on? If it doesn't end someplace, how is that possible? Doesn't everything have a place where it begins and a place where it ends? Can it just be there taking up space everywhere?

2007-09-29 05:17:10 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

just wondering

2007-09-29 05:00:09 · 37 answers · asked by suzie 3

How many stars does it take to go from the earth to the moon?

2007-09-29 04:58:37 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-29 04:52:45 · 11 answers · asked by Savo 2

2007-09-29 04:49:05 · 7 answers · asked by lvgeno 7

1. why do we not have 2 eclipses during one lunar evolution?


2. Which way does the moon revolve? and HOW does the moon revolve..like..wut does the moon do?

2007-09-29 04:02:38 · 3 answers · asked by toriw94 1

i think the weather may change, but what do u think

2007-09-29 03:55:51 · 9 answers · asked by anGee B. x33 1

2007-09-29 02:54:50 · 4 answers · asked by Scythian1950 7

2007-09-29 02:33:14 · 10 answers · asked by stranger 2

..
A lone Amateur is said to have Built the Successful 'Ark'.

Whereas, A Large Group of Amazing Professionals Built the Ill-fated 'Titanic'.

How can we explain these phenomena?

"Titanic' proved that 'a ship in harbor is safe but that's not what ships are for.'

Any such Individual feats & group failures?

Just wondering!
..

2007-09-29 02:28:43 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

which were formed a million years after the big bang .but the light from the oldest havent had enough time to reach us , as the rate at which the universe expands is greater than the speed of light . even if technology allowed us to see that far the light from the oldest stars wouldn't have reached us, right???

2007-09-29 02:26:48 · 3 answers · asked by stranger 2

I live in the Philippines, in Manila, where the bright city lights might interfere with my viewing. Is it possible for me to see Mars in this condition? If I can, how, when, and where?

2007-09-29 01:28:12 · 6 answers · asked by Hino-chan 1

Excluding religion and God, what are some logical/philosophical/scientific explanations for the existence of a universe?

2007-09-29 01:12:08 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-29 00:34:02 · 14 answers · asked by Y!A-FOOL 5

2007-09-28 22:15:20 · 16 answers · asked by LITTLE NUGGET 3

2007-09-28 21:20:23 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-28 20:33:52 · 4 answers · asked by jai18 1

And What Happens To The EM Waves When They Reach The Edge?

2007-09-28 17:43:44 · 9 answers · asked by engelfeurs 2

2007-09-28 17:36:30 · 8 answers · asked by aim w 3

Hint -The answer is not the obvious one!

2007-09-28 17:29:47 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-28 17:18:46 · 4 answers · asked by SANDY T 1

..after all; it is the most abundunt element in the Universe, so is He/She???

2007-09-28 17:12:21 · 12 answers · asked by Bug Eye 3

2007-09-28 17:12:03 · 8 answers · asked by SANDY T 1

Just curious.
Well to be honest, I was wondering if NASA can't build a robot space tug to go out to the asteroid belt to pick up a suitable Icy Ice asteroid to mine/process into rocket fuel and a Metal Element asteroid to mine/process-*experiemental ore processing and raw materiel fabrication.

Because, once the robot space tugs have a viable re-fueling depot (in orbit) they can go back out to get more asteroids for exploration & processing for building materials.
We would only have to send up the exotic essentials for building our future space station/platforms.

Well, then it gets more complicated of course, but I just had to ask, we gotta start somewhere,...

Thanks to those who Do know better,... cheers!!!

2007-09-28 17:03:08 · 4 answers · asked by somber_pieces 6

2007-09-28 16:51:07 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Wouldn't it be possible to build a new type of space shuttle that could simply coast into orbit on interia alone if it accelerated to the desired Mach speed for its mass to attain a sub-orbital trajectory?

Then we can finally stop sending our astronauts up on potential bombs waiting for an opportunity to go boom.

Also the potential for a commercial civil aerospace program could be acheivable a lot sooner. If there are entrepenures out there with enough moxie to make it happen.

2007-09-28 16:46:42 · 4 answers · asked by somber_pieces 6

2007-09-28 16:23:11 · 13 answers · asked by Giggle Bear 3