Astronomy & Space - March 2007

2007-03-02 00:51:46 · 3 answers · asked by goring 6

2007-03-02 00:43:49 · 4 answers · asked by goring 6

2007-03-02 00:35:26 · 6 answers · asked by goring 6

2007-03-02 00:34:59 · 4 answers · asked by cathy374507 1

2007-03-02 00:32:56 · 4 answers · asked by goring 6

the object is a unique star that is very near the end of its evolution and is not a binary or multiple star, a nova (all novae are binary systems), a supernova, or a supermassive star. Furthermore, it is a variable star that is not visible without optical aid, is located in Sagittarius, and was discovered relatively recently by an amateur astronomer.

2007-03-02 00:31:17 · 2 answers · asked by maryrelaxing 2

2007-03-02 00:28:28 · 3 answers · asked by goring 6

2007-03-02 00:25:57 · 4 answers · asked by goring 6

It would seem that the speed increase while falling in towards a planet due to gravity would be cancelled out when it goes away.

2007-03-02 00:21:10 · 5 answers · asked by Bazza66 3

I asked this question and received interesting answers from my friends. Let me explain what the fact...is

We don’t see same stars. It is because of the earth spinning, rotation and galactic momentum. We are on the outer edge on the Milky Way (Orion Arm). It is obvious that we are on the highest galactic momentum than the inner side of the Milky Way. The central part (bulge) of the Milky Way will have less orbital speed than the outer edge. Hence, we are not limited to the only view of the stars inside the Milky Way. The celestial space (outside Milky Way) contains various stars clusters and they don’t spin with Milky Way and hence we see different clusters as we spin as a Galaxy. Thank you and I hope receiving more stars from you.

2007-03-02 00:20:47 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-01 23:14:50 · 2 answers · asked by track_gurl 1

well, m not sure bout this myth...but is this true that a meteor is approaching towards our earth around 24 april 2011 or sumthing..??? had lots of discussion

2007-03-01 23:06:34 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Lunar is a latin-based word ('Luna', Spanish - 'Lune', French), why is it a LEM (Lunar Excursion Vehicle), rather than a MEM (moonar excursion vehicle) and so on, in all the Space jargon. Is there any reason for this.
Thank you.

2007-03-01 23:06:16 · 5 answers · asked by free n' dating 2

2007-03-01 22:39:40 · 10 answers · asked by me_you_lovingly 1

2007-03-01 22:23:26 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

If you could somehow launch a Satellites into Geostationary Orbit would you have to pay Nasa of one of those europian space agencies to keep your Satellites there

2007-03-01 22:12:00 · 2 answers · asked by Mutley! 5

Does it shoot down rays of light? What colors? Do lights twinkle?

2007-03-01 22:10:34 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-01 21:38:59 · 26 answers · asked by cmt 1

as per einstine ether have low density but as per me it may possible that it has high density since we can swim in space?

2007-03-01 20:52:45 · 4 answers · asked by jay d 1

I have seen a study that showed the crop circle under a microscope and it showed the entire molecular structure had been changed from the man made crop circles not to mention it took almost 15 hours to make the man made crop circle of just a few hundread feet and it had to be done in a single night and some of these range upto miles long in amazing patterns that are just not comprehendable to achieve in such short ammounts of time.

2007-03-01 20:51:36 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-01 20:43:28 · 6 answers · asked by Mani 1

No more alien junk people ain't nobody going to reach us, help us, or harm us from another "planet". Nothing travels faster than the Speed of Light, if things could photons would, when they are so highly energized from IR wavelength to Gamma Rays, always the SAME Speed of Light, (Constant)

if there was such a thing as a habitable planet anywhere in our Galaxy would be 100's if not 1000's of Light Years away, virtually impossible to reach us, almost by design, we would probably fight with them anyways LOL, better separated LOL

2007-03-01 20:34:21 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think it would have been possible to pass the radiation belt without any lead suits?

2007-03-01 20:34:04 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

It much more than 15 milliards years for stars and other objects to go so far distance unless they had gone faster than light!,regarding big bang time,it seems impossible.

2007-03-01 20:02:49 · 6 answers · asked by mfarhadi2468 1

If quantum fluctuations can lead to whole of universe’s matter & energy & why this is not repeating with age of universe being at least 12billion years

To me it appears that there is enough possibility for big bang to repeat or should have already repeated plenty number of times in span of 12billion years with in limits of uncertainty principle in what ever scale like smaller bang, tiny bang etc

If it has already repeated then we should get interference pattern for cosmic radiation but there are pretty smother.

Where I have gone wrong can any one explain

2007-03-01 19:36:12 · 17 answers · asked by Dr Umesh Bilagi 2

2007-03-01 19:30:06 · 5 answers · asked by tmamir 1

2007-03-01 19:06:59 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

.. their source??

2007-03-01 18:57:25 · 1 answers · asked by litokiddocrave 2

2007-03-01 18:44:35 · 11 answers · asked by 808 2

Here is a site with charts.
http://www.levity.com/eschaton/Why2012.html
Keep in mind that the Mayans in the calendar had many things right on the money to the date.

2007-03-01 18:12:01 · 5 answers · asked by albertzelaya 1