Astronomy & Space - December 2006

2006-12-27 13:47:01 · 9 answers · asked by Syed S 1

2006-12-27 12:57:19 · 8 answers · asked by samantha j 1

2006-12-27 12:50:19 · 8 answers · asked by darren r 1

what circumstances would there need to be to cause earth's gravity to cease existing yet still preserving life on earth

2006-12-27 12:44:06 · 11 answers · asked by cchambers123 2

2006-12-27 12:43:04 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

The earth precesses on its axis, so that would affect the seasons, and the rising and setting of the sun. The ancient Romans celebrated the day of "Sol Invictus" on Dec 25th. Could it have been because the winter solstice was later than now?

2006-12-27 12:34:41 · 7 answers · asked by Charles d 3

Would NASA send something to block it? If not how would affect the US? or the World. Do you think it is as powerful as a atomic bomb?

2006-12-27 12:21:02 · 7 answers · asked by Husain B. 2

2006-12-27 12:14:52 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-27 11:51:28 · 6 answers · asked by thikingdomcome 2

2006-12-27 11:50:28 · 6 answers · asked by sea king 1

2006-12-27 11:48:41 · 6 answers · asked by fairy baby : ) 1

I also heard that the quote has been changed over the years to say this, " The earth is blue, but there is no god. "

2006-12-27 11:41:23 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

perhaps the luna vehicle or the flag, something at least to tell that "someone was here."

2006-12-27 11:10:59 · 10 answers · asked by Whyso? 1

2006-12-27 11:09:33 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-27 11:09:27 · 8 answers · asked by um 1

2006-12-27 11:09:25 · 7 answers · asked by *:+:♥PebbleZ♥:+:* 2

2006-12-27 11:04:38 · 20 answers · asked by area52 6

2006-12-27 10:51:35 · 7 answers · asked by um 1

And that larger system is comparable to an atom in an even larger system, and so on and so forth.

2006-12-27 10:28:00 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-27 10:26:26 · 6 answers · asked by um 1

2006-12-27 10:08:57 · 40 answers · asked by scceptical1 1

2006-12-27 10:06:31 · 11 answers · asked by forest lover 2

It is totally untrue that we have not been back due to there being no need. The scientists and specifically geologists waiting for more information from the moon were devastated at the Apollos 18 to 20 being cancelled.

It was money and the times (Vietnam war). The moon shots were incredibly expensive. Just to develop the lander cost about 2 billion dollars back then.

When the Saturn V rocket was mothballed, they have not got a rocket that will take humans beyond earth oribit. To do that, they would have to rebuild the Saturn V or design a new rocket.

Do not believe the people that say there is no need, they do not know what they are talking about and are not much better than those idiots who think it was faked.

We only got a tiny fraction of lunar information from the six Apollo moon landings.

2006-12-27 09:27:32 · 4 answers · asked by nick s 6

2006-12-27 09:26:37 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

There hasn't been a moon landing since the 60s by humans. Why not?

2006-12-27 08:42:34 · 15 answers · asked by calbuzz 1

2006-12-27 08:28:10 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-27 07:48:36 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-27 07:32:27 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

There have been a lot of astronomical missions lately to find evidence of intelligent life in outer space. If one of those missions is successful and find a civilization at a nearby star, what should we do about it?

2006-12-27 07:06:16 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Steady-State theory vs. The Big Bang theory which one to believe?

2006-12-27 06:41:37 · 28 answers · asked by Leandro 2