Astronomy & Space - September 2006

2006-09-19 04:43:41 · 11 answers · asked by Piranha 1

2006-09-19 04:27:28 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-19 04:23:11 · 4 answers · asked by ryoheisukichan 1

Suppose the planet is very beautiful and food, water , air and all other things are available. But there are no humans , then would you like to live in the planet?

2006-09-19 04:22:59 · 20 answers · asked by venkat Subramaniam 2

2006-09-19 04:16:13 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-19 03:58:10 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-19 03:55:40 · 10 answers · asked by fluff 1

2006-09-19 03:28:38 · 8 answers · asked by ne2 1

Report says scientists say we must return to the moon. Why?

I'm not opposed to space exploration and was a fan of Gerard O'Neill's idea of cities in space. I know that space exploration has given tremendous strength to technological development that have radically improved our lives. A late-uncle who had a machine shop that worked with the Apollo program said the biggest technology improvements in machining at that time came because of auto racing and NASA. Electronics, meanwhile, have soared on technology advances begun for space. Even medicine has had quantum-leap moments in part spurred by NASA needing to understand the humans they send up.

But why MUST we return to the moon?

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/space/09/19/return.to.the.moon.ap/index.html

2006-09-19 03:27:18 · 17 answers · asked by Rabbit 7

2006-09-19 03:13:31 · 7 answers · asked by ash 1

2006-09-19 02:51:58 · 22 answers · asked by Pronkville 3

2006-09-19 02:48:11 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-19 02:17:38 · 25 answers · asked by ziik 1

2006-09-19 02:13:09 · 15 answers · asked by auma_612 1

natural objects like the Himalayas OR artifical objects like huge constructions

2006-09-19 02:01:34 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-19 01:49:46 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-19 01:47:46 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

and if so, Do you know any of them?

and ET if you want to answer, feel free to do so.

2006-09-19 01:00:24 · 6 answers · asked by ? 3

how many hours / days did it take to fly from the earth to the moon? how many kilometres is it from the earth to the moon? have any of the space shuttles travelled through the dangerous radiation belts above earth?

2006-09-19 00:28:50 · 10 answers · asked by jjc3333 1

2006-09-19 00:19:50 · 16 answers · asked by Cardinal64 2

2006-09-19 00:03:06 · 3 answers · asked by Atomin 5

What are the best points to argue that the moon landing was a hoax?

2006-09-19 00:00:34 · 15 answers · asked by jjc3333 1

2006-09-18 23:47:46 · 9 answers · asked by jc041174 1

2006-09-18 23:46:24 · 9 answers · asked by jc041174 1

if so, cn u share ur freaky story??? it shud be scary.....(d scariest story will get 10 pts!)

2006-09-18 23:30:16 · 7 answers · asked by gel 2

2006-09-18 22:05:20 · 9 answers · asked by Praveer 1

what is out side universe?

2006-09-18 21:53:23 · 15 answers · asked by anamika 1

being formed from extraterrestrial contact ? The idea that we were somehow cross bred between Neanderthal types and more sophisticated beings form far away and that these beings gave the Egyptians special knowledge about building pyramids ?

2006-09-18 19:59:07 · 11 answers · asked by sandwreckoner 4

If you haven't heard Pluto is no longer a planet class. Because it is a big ball of ice. (Jupiter is just a ball of gas thoough) And its new name is something like 0100110.

Does anyone else think this is stupid? I mean if a ball of gas is a plant why not a ball of ice? And why on earth change the name to a bunch of numbers? For 100s of years its been known as Pluto, so why not just leave it be as Pluto?

I think the whole thing is a load and some sciencetes is just trying to make a name for themselfs.

What do you think?

2006-09-18 19:39:24 · 11 answers · asked by Sekkennight 3

2006-09-18 19:34:13 · 8 answers · asked by David D 1